Search Results

1. Butler - Mangawhati 3B1 and Takahiwai 3A2 (2010) 7 Taitokerau MB 260 (7 TTK 260) [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...Respondents Hearing: 17 March 2010 (Heard at Gisborne) Appearances: G Webb for the applicants J Bunbury for the respondents Judgment: 2 July 2010 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD Introduction [1] The hearing of this application continues a long and protracted series of applications between these parties. This application was filed by Mr and Mrs Brownlie (the Brownlies) in 2008 following a previous long running dispute between the parties. [2] There...

2. Brownlie v Brown - Pipituangi A (2010) 7 Tairāwhiti MB (7 TRW 39) [pdf, 417 KB]

   ...2010 (Heard at Gisbome) JOANNE BROWN HELEN MARY RENNER Respondents Appearances: G Webb for the applicants J Bunbury for the respondents Judgment: 2 July 2010 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD Introduction [1] The hearing of this application continues a long and protracted series of applications between these parties. This application was filed by Mr and Mrs Brownlie (the Brownlies) in 2008 following a previous long running dispute between the parties. [2] The histor...

3. Te Manutukutuku 74 [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...The district inquiries, focusing mainly on histor­ ical claims, have also taken longer to complete than anticipated in 2014. They now include a new inquiry in the North­eastern Bay of Plenty dis­ trict, granted in June this year in response to applications for a hearing of Whakatōhea’s historical claims. The district, remedies, and many urgent inquiries are concerned mainly with historical claims or the pro­ cess for settling those claims with the Crown. They therefore remain t...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 119 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...LEOTA v PARCEL EXPRESS LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 119 [5 September 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 119 EMPC 167/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for access to court documents by Emma Jane Butcher on behalf of Freightways Limited BETWEEN MIKA LEO...

5. E81 Karen Wilson (Engagement) - EIC - Te Ākitai Waiohua [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...engagement approach is appropriate, but it is fundamental that there is also consultation targeted at specific mana whenua groups. Neither has occurred to date in a satisfactory manner.10 An effective relationship with the Applicant should have been formed ahead of lodging the applications and that ‘timely, meaningful and effective engagement’ should have already occurred to the point where the Applicant was aware of what the cultural values are and what the impacts of the...

6. Regulatory Impact Statement improvements to district court rules [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...Analysis: Regulatory Impact Statement – Improvements to District Courts Rules Executive summary 1. The District Courts Rules 2009 (the Rules) prescribe pre-court procedural steps that require parties in civil cases to exchange lengthy court forms before their case comes before a judge. These requirements are time-consuming and can make limited contribution to resolving a case. 2. This RIS reviews three options for addressing these problems: A. retaining the status quo; B. ado...

7. [2020] NZIACDT 21 - Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v Penty (18 May 2020) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...2014 (the Code). The Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar), the head of the Authority, has referred the complaint to the Tribunal. The most serious allegation is that Ms Penty relied on unlicensed persons in the Philippines to perform immigration services for clients, contrary to the Act. [3] An almost identical complaint against Mr Cleland has already been upheld by the Tribunal and he was found to have breached numerous provisions of the Code. While formally denyi...

8. Q Ltd v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 772 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 158 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 772 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay Q Ltd $1057.44 by 29 December 2023. Reasons: 1. RX took his company car to TT, a business owned by S Ltd, for new pipes to be fitted in the exhaust. S Ltd’s employee replaced the chamber with pipes and the car was handed over to RX, after he p...

9. HX v OH [2024] NZDT 849 (7 October 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...be paid that amount, but that they did need to re-negotiate the price. OH wanted her float back. After some discussion they agreed to $3,800 cash plus a small disused tractor and mulcher that HX had seen on OH’s property. 7. On 13 March HX informed OH that upon closer inspection of the tractor he decided that to was “too far gone” and he was no longer interested in the tractor and mulcher. 8. On 27 March, OH paid HX a further $1,800, bringing the total she has paid to $4,800....

10. LCRO 145/2021 AZ v BY (28 October 2022) [pdf, 205 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 118 Ref: LCRO 145/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [x] BETWEEN AZ Applicant AND BY Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr AZ has applied for...