Search Results

1. [2021] NZACC 164 – Wilson v ACC (19 October 2021) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 164 ACR 398/17 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT ON A QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MICHAEL WILSON Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Ms Bransgrove for the applicant Ms F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 19 October 2021 ___________________...

2. Govind v Chandra [2018] NZIACDT 46 (15 November 2018) [pdf, 260 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2018] NZIACDT 46 Reference No: IACDT 002/16 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Nilesh Govind Complainant AND Ashwini Chandra Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms C Pendleton, lawyer,

3. CN v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 744 (26 November 2024) [pdf, 216 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 744 APPLICANT CN RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. N Ltd operate an online store specialising in cashmere clothing. 2. On 2nd June 2024, CN placed an order for a polo cashmere sweater. The sweater was on sale and CN paid $284.00 for the sweater including shipping. 3. On 9 June 2024,...

4. Far North District Council v Maihi – Maungakawakawa 5G (2013) 52 Taitokerau MB 138 (52 TTK 138) [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...for this Court. First, in respect of what period can the Council claim in terms of s 99 of the 2002 Act? Second, has the Council established its entitlement to a charging order under the 2002 Act? Section 99 [5] The Council filed the present application on 23 March 2012. It seeks a charging order for rates arrears of $31,067.36. It claims rates (including penalties) from 2 July 2005 up to and including a second instalment penalty charged on 28 52 Taitokerau MB 140 Novem...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 86 Lyttleton Port Company Ltd v Pender [pdf, 325 KB]

   ...within Mr Pender’s group. Mr Pender viewed this as a vacancy to which he should be appointed. The company did not view things in this way. Mr Pender surmised that this was because he was pursuing a personal grievance. The April 2018 issue formed the basis for a second claim of unjustifiable disadvantage. [4] The Authority upheld Mr Pender’s claim, awarded him $800 by way of reimbursement for lost wages and $12,500 compensation under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Employment Relations...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 124 Amien v Reipen and Others interlocutory [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...NZEmpC 124 [5 October 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2011] NZEmpC 124 WRC 27/11 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a freezing order and an ancillary order BETWEEN JAIME MELGAREJO AMIEN, OF SAN DIEGO, USA Applicant AND KARL HEINZ REIPEN First Respondent AND AWAKINO FORTUNE LTD Second Respondent AND BAILEY INGHAM LTD Third Respondent Hearing: (on the papers) Appearances: Kate Hay, counsel for the applicant Judgm...

7. LCRO 89/2017 FZ v LS [pdf, 229 KB]

   LCRO 89/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN FZ Applicant AND LS Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr FZ has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee to take no further action in...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 58 Martin v Solar Bright Ltd (in liq) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...of one proceeding is likely to have a material effect on the other. 5 See Spackman v Martin [2021] NZHC 157. 6 The causes of action are not referred to in the High Court decision, but Mr Spackman disclosed them in a separate affidavit which formed part of a discontinued application to this Court seeking to be joined as a party to the proceeding. 7 By reference to the Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 189(1) and 221(d); and see Transpacific All Brite Ltd v Sanko [2012] NZEmpC 7....

9. AEQ v ZVF & ZVE [2012] NZDT 268 (16 July 2012) [pdf, 48 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 268 BETWEEN AEQ APPLICANT AND ZVE FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZVF SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 16 July 2012 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim against ZVF is dismissed. ZVE is to pay $700.00 to AEQ (trading as UD) within ten days of the date of this order Facts [1] AEQ sought to enforce a contr...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 208 Wei v Sunlight JMB Future Ltd [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 208 EMPC 206/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a stay of execution AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN WENLI WEI Plaintiff AND SUNLIGHT JMB FUTURE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Ap...