Search Results

1. Reedy - Waitangi A1A2 (2003) 65 Ruatōria MB 168 (65 RUA 168) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   Place: Present: Date: Gisborne Judge C.L. Wickliffe KW. Lardelli, Clerk of the Court 12 May 2003 Application No: A20020002622 Subject: Sections: Counsel: Waitangi A1A2 & Other Blocks 238/93 Mr Bunbury DECISION Application and Issues Minute Book: 65 RUA 168 This matter concerns an application filed by Mr Manana Kaua Terangi Reedy under section 239/93 for the replacement of Trustees. That application was filed in April 2002. After considering the grounds fo...

2. [2010] NZSC 218 CA780/2009 Parker v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...Court: William Young P, O'Regan and Arnold JJ Counsel: B A Corkill QC for Applicants T P Cleary for First Respondent P J Gunn for Second Respondent Judgment: 28 May 2010 at 3.30 pm JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A The application for leave to appeal in CA800/2009 is declined. B The application for CA780/2009 to be heard in conjunction with CA800/2009 is dismissed. C The applicant being legally aided, we make no order for costs. REASONS OF THE COURT...

3. [2021] NZACC 191 - Smith v ACC (1 December 2021) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...the appellant Ms F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 1 December 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J McGUIRE [ Adequacy of evidence of accident causing injury; late claim S 53(3)(a) Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue are two decisions of the Accident Compensation Corporation: [a] A decision of 4 April 2017 declining cover...

4. EF Ltd & EFE Ltd v UU [2015] NZDT 925 (3 August 2015) [pdf, 83 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 925 BETWEEN EF LTD APPLICANT AND EFE LTD APPLICANT’S INSURER AND UU RESPONDENT Date of Order: 3 August 2015 Referee: Referee Palu ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that UU is to pay EFE Ltd $3,286.13 on or before 5.00pm, Monday 24 August 2015. Facts [1] In December 2014 UU reversed his truck into a Toyota Hilux utility vehicle that was driving north along S...

5. KC v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1352 (12 March 2021) [pdf, 205 KB]

   (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1352 APPLICANT KC RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Q Ltd is to pay $2,200.00 to KC by 3 April 2021. 2. A copy of this order is to be emailed to the respondent. Reasons Did Q Ltd comply with its legal obligations as a private training establishment? 1. The facts are that on 24 November 2020 KC signed up through Q Ltd’s (Q Ltd

6. Nairn v Peebles LCRO 109 / 2010 (14 December 2010) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...actions taken by the Practitioner at that time to address the matter. [22] The question that remains is whether the Practitioner ought to have known about the title problem from the 23 June letter sent to him by the Purchaser‟s solicitor, as is claimed by the Applicant. It is clear that the letter was written with reference to the „Due Diligence” provision in the sale contract. The due diligence clause is stated in the following terms: This Agreement is conditional upon t...

7. Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre (Costs) [2021] NZHRRT 57 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...papers DATE OF DECISION: 20 December 2021 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 INTRODUCTION [1] Following a three-day hearing from 6 to 8 July 2020 the Tribunal, in Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10, upheld Ms Cook’s claim of an interference with her privacy and awarded damages of $6,000 against the Manawatu Community Law Centre (MCLC) under ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993 (PA) for hurt and humiliation and injury to the feelings of Ms Cook...

8. KK v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 258 (29 May 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

9. [2020] NZIACDT 43 - KX v Ji (5 October 2020) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: J McLeod, counsel Adviser: Self-represented 2 PRELIMINARY [1] Mr Yan Ryan Ji, the adviser, was instructed by KX, the complainant, to obtain a work visa. He duly filed the application, but did not tell her that it was declined. He then filed two requests on her behalf for discretionary visas, without instructions. Nor did he inform the complainant they were unsuccessful. When she enquired about progress of th...

10. CP Ltd v XL Ltd 2016 NZDT 906 (16 March 2016) [pdf, 123 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 906 BETWEEN CP LIMITED APPLICANT AND XL LIMITED RESPONDENT Date of Order: 16 March 2016 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that XL Limited is to pay the sum of $12,522.69 directly to CP Limited on or before 6 April 2016. Reasons [1] CP Limited (‘CP’) purchased a restaurant from XL Limited (‘XL’) in June 2015. CP claims that equipment...