13139 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 145 APPLICANT NW RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. NW booked fights for her family of four with B Ltd for departure on 17 March 2021 at 6.30am from [City A], arriving 7.45am at [City B], and connecting with a K flight leaving [City B] at 10.10am for [City C]. 3. At 8.21pm on...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 110 APPLICANT SH RESPONDENT TS The Tribunal orders: 1. TS is to pay $2,500.00 to SH on or before Friday 16 September 2022. 2. Within 21 consecutive days of SH receiving the money in full, TS may collect the [vehicle] at his sole cost. SH is to ensure the vehicle is reasonably available for collection during normal...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 77 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT US The Tribunal orders: US is to pay NN $1964.75 by 18 February 2024 and may be paid into account [redacted]. Reasons: 1. On 11 June 2023, NN purchased a [vehicle 1] from US by paying him $2000 in cash and giving him a [vehicle 2] (with an agreed value of $2500). NN had seen the car advertised [online]...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1469 APPLICANT TM RESPONDENT DD The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2018, TM purchased a horse known as T from DD for $10,000. 2. T was transported to TM in [Redacted]. 3. In October 2018, TM contacted DD and indicated that T was not walking correctly. 4....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1599 APPLICANT EO RESPONDENT BD Ltd The Tribunal orders: BD Ltd is to pay $750.00 to EO on or before 21 August 2021. Reasons 1. EO ordered vinyl planks with a woodgrain effect from BD Ltd (‘BD’) in October 2020 based on a sample plank supplied to her. She paid $1500.00 for the product to BD (and another $1500...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 85 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT BX The Tribunal orders: BX is to pay MT $6,000.00 on or before 1 February 2024. Reasons 1. On about 31 August 2022, MT lent BX, his then flatmate, $4,000.00 to help BX with some medical expenses. The agreement, drafted by BX, included $1,200.00 for interest, $500.00 for a “convenience and rapid service f...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 459 APPLICANT LR RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. U Ltd is to pay $2,304.34 to LR on or before 9 July 2024. 2. This order is to be emailed and posted to the parties. Reasons: 3. The matter has previously been adjourned as SE, U Ltd said he had not received Notice of the Hearing. U Ltd’s contact details were updated in...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 680 APPLICANT HI RESPONDENT UL The Tribunal orders: UL is to pay HI $10,575.00 within 28 days. UL did not appear at the hearing. Reasons [1] HI purchased a house in [Suburb] from UL. HI claims that some items that should have been included with the sale had been removed when he took possession of the house, and he seeks an order for comp...
...representatives”.19 (b) Outside a lawyer-client relationship [53] A duty of confidence may also arise for a lawyer outside a lawyer-client relationship. That is, where the lawyer does not act for the person from whom the lawyer receives information, and who claims confidentiality. [54] In such circumstances, r 8.8, referred to by Dr OR in her application for review, requires that a lawyer: must not breach or risk breaching a duty of confidence owed by the lawyer that has aris...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 12 Reference No. HRRT 027/2011 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RAZDAN RAFIQ PLAINTIFF AND COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr S Hickey, Member Dr A Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr E Child and Mr T Hallett-Hook for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 A...