Search Results

1. ABS Ltd v ZYL and ZYK [2013] NZDT 36 (15 March 2013) [pdf, 99 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 36 BETWEEN ABS Ltd APPLICANT AND ZYL FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZYK SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 15 March 2013 Referee: Referee Edison ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim against ZYL and ZYK is dismissed. Facts [1] ABS Ltd owns 18 acres of land adjacent to land jointly owned by ZYL and ZYK. The boundary was fenced with a 7-wire fence. In the claim form, ABS...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 227 O’Hagan v Waitomo Adventures Ltd [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...Braun and M Brady, counsel for defendant Judgment: 12 December 2014 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] Mr O’Hagan was employed by Waitomo Adventures Limited (WAL). He departed from the company in 2009. He subsequently claimed, amongst other things, that he had been constructively dismissed. The Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dismissed that aspect of the grievance and awarded costs of $3,500 in WAL’s favour. 1 Mr O’Hagan challenged the...

3. Mayfair Street Units v Spargo [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...project manager who supervised all the work carried out on units 11 and 12 in his personal capacity. Secondly, he is alleged to be liable as company director. The fourth respondent, Gianne Marchesan, was the plasterer and texture coating system applicator. He was also the managing director of Europlast Systems Limited. The fifth respondent, Ross Bryant Design Network Limited, was the designer of the units. Prior to hearing, this respondent settled its claim with the claima...

4. [2022] NZIACDT 2 - TC v Registrar (11 February 2022) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...of [Immigration advisory company 1] of Auckland. At the relevant time, the adviser was at [Immigration advisory company 2]. [4] On an unknown date, the adviser was instructed by the appellant in relation to both work visa and residence visa applications. It is not known when the work visa application was made. [5] On about 31 January 2019, the appellant made an application to Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) for residence for him and his family (application signed by...

5. Heaslip - The Estate of Wilhelmina Floate or Wilhelmina Fisher or Wilhelmina Newton (2005) 110 South Island MB 110 (110 SI 110) [pdf, 1002 KB]

   Millute Bool<: 110 SI 110 IN THE MAoRI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT Place: Present: Date: Application No: Subject: Section: Hearing: Applicant: Introduction Wellington C M Wainwright, Judge Claire Mason, Clerk of the Court 9 February 2005 A 19990005454 A19990005455 A19990005458 Wilhelmina Floate (or Fisher or Newton) 118/93 3 November 2004 Theona Mina Heaslip RESERVED DECISION Theona Heaslip has filed an application seeking a...

6. Tawera v Tawera – Waitangi A1A2 (2014) 39 Tairawhiti MB 45 (39 TRW 45) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT A20130007882 A20130009082 UNDER Sections 19 and 330, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waitangi A1A2 Block BETWEEN PEKAMA TAWERA Applicant AND WI PEWHAIRANGI BILL TAWERA DENISE TAWERA Respondents Hearing: 4 November 2013, 35 Tairawhiti MB 1-86 (Heard at Gisborne) Appearances: M Insley, counsel for the applicant N Weatherhead, counsel for...

7. OC v KD & BD [2024] NZDT 393 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehea...

8. EK v UP [2013] NZDT 751 (19 November 2013) [pdf, 80 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 751 BETWEEN EK APPLICANT AND UP RESPONDENT Date of Order: 19 November 2013 Referee: Referee Roberts ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] On 3 March 2013 UP’s 13 year old daughter drove her 22 year old sister’s car into the wooden wall at EK. [2] The police told A and B, the owners of EK, that UP was liable for the cost of rep...

9. [2024] NZEmpC 25 Roberts v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...Introduction [1] This is a challenge to a preliminary determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 [2] The determination resolved a number of matters against the plaintiff. While the challenge is de novo, he only pursues the breach of contract claims arising from 1 Roberts v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [2023] NZERA 305 (Member Larmer). the express terms of the Department of Corrections Frontline Staff (Prisons Based) Collective Agree...

10. Carey Clan Trust v Still [pdf, 51 KB]

    SUMMARY Case: Carey Clan Trust v Still File No: TRI 2009-101-000022/ DBH 05711 Court: WHT Adjudicator: C Ruthe Date of Decision: 23 December 2009 Background The claimant pursued their claim against a number of parties, many of which were removed from the proceedings prior to the hearing. The remaining respondents therefore included the first and second respondents, Mr and Mrs Still, the third respondent, Tauranga City Council and the seventh respondent, Western Coatings...