Search Results

1. Mayfair Street Units v Spargo [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...complies with each of the relevant provisions of the building code. [(2A) omitted (3) Except where a code compliance certificate has already been provided pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the territorial authority shall issue to the applicant in the prescribed form, on payment of any charge fixed by the territorial authority, a code compliance certificate, if it is satisfied on reasonable grounds that— (a) The building work to which the certificate relates complies with t...

2. L Foundation v OS [2023] NZDT 555 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 254 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 555 APPLICANT L Foundation RESPONDENT OS The Tribunal orders: 1. OS is to deliver the dog HJ to EV (as representative of the L Foundation), or to make HJ reasonably available for EV to collect, by no later than 1 June 2023. 2. OS is to pay L Foundation $7,235.00 by 1 June 2023. Reasons 1. The adjournment order dated 9 Fe...

3. LCRO 185/2020 BC v DE and FG decision & minute (20 May 2021 & 30 April 2021) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...been made on 6 May 2020. [12] In early June 2020 Ms BC wrote to Ms DE complaining that the latter had not provided documents to her as required by the procedural directions. She referred to the Privacy Act 1993, and made an information privacy request for release to her of a large number of documents held by RL. [13] Ms BC also asked the ERA to intervene in connection with her information privacy request, but was informed that it did not have the jurisdiction to make the release...

4. Waters v Alpine Energy Ltd (Discovery No. 2) [2015] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...issues to be considered afresh. See Alpine Energy Ltd v Human Rights Review Tribunal [2014] NZHC 2792 at [34]. This was because in determining whether a discovery order should be made in respect of the documents for which confidentiality has been claimed by Alpine Energy, the Tribunal failed to consider whether the documents were both relevant and sufficiently probative to the issues raised by Mr Waters to overcome the confidentiality interests sought to be protected by Alpine Energy....

5. Liufau v Lelatu [2014] NZIACDT 43 (31 March 2014) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...March 2014 2 DECISION Introduction [1] The Complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully and sought the Adviser’s assistance to apply for a visa. He agreed, the Complainant paid fees and after a long delay the Adviser lodged an application. [2] The complaint is that the Adviser did not have a written agreement and his conduct lacked care and diligence. [3] The Adviser did not dispute the facts, but said he had met his professional obligations. [4] The Tribunal has...

6. CL v BK [2021] NZDT 1612 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

7. J Ltd v PE Ltd [2024] NZDT 357 (9 March 2024) [pdf, 112 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 357 APPLICANT J Ltd RESPONDENT PE Ltd The Tribunal orders: PE Ltd is not liable to pay J Ltd the sum of $6,790.75 for the amount of J Ltd’s final invoice for flooring work. Reasons: 1. PE Ltd owns a property in [location], it is occupied by its director and shareholders, KN and NT. In early 2023 KN contacted J Ltd regard...

8. Gill v ACC [2013] NZACA 17 [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...doing this, I have applied s 108(11), which provides that the procedure of the Authority shall, subject to the Act, be as the Authority determines and s 108(10), which provides that proceedings before the Authority shall not be held bad for want of form. [9] Section 110(3) provides that where an application is made for an adjournment and the Authority, in the interests of justice, considers that the adjournment should be allowed but that the adjournment will cause inconvenience to the a...

9. [2022] NZIACDT 28 - DD v Pabellon (15 November 2022) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: Self-represented Adviser: E Fleming, counsel 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The complainant, DD, who was studying for a PhD in New Zealand, consulted the adviser, Alicia Pabellon, about residence. A residence application was duly made, but it was withdrawn when Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) pointed out that the complainant did not qualify. In particular, Ms Pabellon had relied on a PhD when in fact the complainant was still studyin...

10. FB v WBOPSC2 LCRO 184 / 2010 (26 August 2011) [pdf, 56 KB]

    LCRO 184/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN FB Of [North Island] Applicant AND WAIKATO-BAY OF PLENTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] The review Applicant is FB (the Prac...