Search Results

1. Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Pre-Trial Admissibility Ruling) [2018] NZHRRT 53 [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...subject of three substantive decisions and seven Minutes. The decisions are: 1 (This decision is to be cited as Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Pre-Trial Admissibility Ruling) [2018] NZHRRT 53.] 1 • Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2017] NZHRRT 34 (8 September 2017) • Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Strike-Out Application) [2017] NZHRRT 38 (2 October 2017) • Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Discovery) [2018] NZHRRT...

2. TC v CC [2024] NZDT 470 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 470 APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT CC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In 2023 TC bought a house from CC. Shortly after moving into the house she discovered black mould under the stairwell. TC was aware prior to purchasing the house that the stairwell had been relined after a leak had caused damage. 2. TC und...

3. Registrar of IAA v Ho [2019] NZIACDT 54 (31 July 2019) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...to New Zealand. Ms Ho says she then spoke to someone at the consultancy about the client’s eligibility for New Zealand migration.1 [6] There followed a series of emails between the client and (Mr C) of the consultancy in which she provided information about herself, in answer to queries from him. He met her at the consultancy’s offices on 10 April 2014. In an email to her that day, Mr C advised that “we feel” she would be eligible to migrate to New Zealand under the gener...

4. Singh v Patel [2019] NZIACDT 17 (28 March 2019) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...withdraw the application being prepared and for the fees paid to be refunded. On 25 June, he informed Mr Patel that he was not satisfied with his service. [14] Mr Patel wrote to Mr Singh on 26 June 2014 recording that on 21 May 2014, Mr Singh requested the return of all his documents so that he could make a copy of them. In early June, he had notified Mr Patel that he no longer wished to retain his services and terminated their agreement. The reason given was that he had change...

5. [2021] NZEmpC 219 E Tū Inc v Rasier Operations BV [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...first, third and fifth defendants, and only very loosely against the second and fourth defendants. If they remain as defendants it will, it is said, significantly impact on the scope of the evidence that is required (because of differences in the applicable business models) and, accordingly, the scale of the hearing. Striking out the claim against them will enable the Court to more effectually deal with the primary dispute. In oral submissions counsel for the defendants, Ms Servi...

6. TS v LD TI & EX& W Inc [2021] NZDT 1598 (23 July 2021) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1598 APPLICANT TS RESPONDENT LD SECOND RESPONDENT TI THIRD RESPONDENT EX INSURER OF THIRD RESPONDENT W Inc The Tribunal orders: 1. LD and TI are to pay $19,165.00 to TS before 23 August 2021. 2. The claim against EX is dismissed. Reasons 1. TS purchased a 5 year old [horse] named...

7. IPT Practice Note 2/2024 Refugee and Protection [pdf, 490 KB]

   ...the Regulations. In this Practice Note: – “appellant” means the appellant, applicant or affected person, as relevant; – “chief executive” means the chief executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; – “claim” means a claim to be recognised as a refugee or protected person; – “deportation (non-resident) appeal” means an appeal against deportation liability by a person who is not a New Zealand resident or citizen; – “fraud or the...

8. Livingstone v Trustees of Lake Taupo Forest Trust – Lake Taupo Forest Trust (2013) 305 Aotea MB 188 (305 AOT 188) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...custodians of the land. [2] Then on 27 February 2013 Mr Livingstone’s application for rehearing was received. Mr Sharp also submitted a memorandum setting out the essential grounds of the application for rehearing: the judgment did not address the claims and the review application that the trustees acted in breach of their trust obligations in dealing with the dropping of 1080 poison on trust lands. [3] Ms Batt for the respondent filed a notice of intention to appear opposing...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 102 Crossen v Yangs House Ltd [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...them. The agreement was completed as a record of settlement under s 149 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). [2] After signing the settlement agreement and being paid the compensatory sum she was owed under it, Mrs Crossen lodged a claim in the Employment Relations Authority for unpaid wages and holiday pay. She considered that her claim was not compromised by the agreement. [3] The Authority disagreed.1 It held that Mrs Crossen was prevented from pursuing the cl...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 60 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd [pdf, 158 KB]

    ...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 60 EMPC 181/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to join a party BETWEEN MICHAEL LANIGAN AND THE OTHER PLAINTIFFS LISTED IN APPENDIX A Plaintiffs AND FONTERRA BRANDS (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearance...