Search Results

1. [2008] NZEmpC AC 19/08 Barry v Anoop Investments Ltd [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...behalf of the defendant on 20 May 2008. There were two main grounds for the objection. The first was that the affidavit was not served on the address for service. It was served by facsimile transmission. The plaintiff’s amended statement of claim provides, in addition to a physical address, a “fax number for service”. This objection therefore is not made out. [3] The second objection had more substance. It was that the affidavit referred to matters that had ta...

2. IS & JS v KC [2021] NZDT 1308 (9 April 2021) [pdf, 219 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1308 APPLICANT IS & JS RESPONDENT KC The Tribunal orders: 1. KC and LC are to pay to IS and JS the sum of $19,950.00 in the following manner: (a) They are to make three annual payments of $5,000.00, and one of $4,950.00; (b) The payments are due on 31 January 2022, 31 January 2023, 31 January 2024 and 31 January

3. LCRO 57/2018 G RC and D RC v YS (30 April 2019) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...available”. [23] The Committee concluded that Mr YS “acted appropriately in the termination of the retainer” having received the report from Dr EF, who had been appointed by the Family Court, to assess Mrs RC’s mental capacity. (2) Request for Mrs RC’s files, records (a) Mr G, as attorney [24] The Committee accepted that “it was arguable” that Mr YS “was entitled to refuse to provide” Mrs RC’s files to Mr G when Mr G’s conduct, as Mrs RC’s attorney, wa...

4. AEF Ltd v ZVQ [2012] NZDT 325 (16 April 2012) [pdf, 49 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 325 BETWEEN AEF Ltd APPLICANT AND ZVQ RESPONDENT Date of Order: 16 April 2012 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZVQ, must pay the amount of $1,340.00 to the Applicant, AEF Ltd, on or before 27 April 2012. Facts [1] The Applicant claims that the Respondent was overdue in payment of $11,304.6...

5. Bennett v Proprietors of the Waipiro A22B3 Incorporation (2014) 39 Tairawhiti MB 257 (39 TRW 257) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...Hayes, John Hocking and Pauline Hayes. 2 [2] Waipiro A22B3 is the only block of land held by the Incorporation. It is Māori freehold land comprising 296.6226 hectares and its total share ownership is 1.0000000000 shares. Background [3] This application pursuant to s 280 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, was filed on behalf of Deanna Bennett on 20 May 2013 seeking an investigation into the affairs of the Waipiro A22B3 Incorporation. [4] The applicant filed the application w...

6. LCRO 195/2017 LH v SR and HP (19 March 2019) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...and a decision in respect to that complaint was delivered in December 2016, following which Mr SR paid Ms LH’s fees, together with interest owing to the date of payment. [8] On 28 February 2017 and 11 March 2017, Mr SR wrote to Ms LH, making request of her to provide him with the original of his relationship property agreement and will. [9] Ms LH did not respond to those requests. [10] On 30 March 2017, Ms LH forwarded an email to Ms HP, enclosing an invoice dated 8 March 2017...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 140 French v Accident Compensation Corporation [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...CORPORATION NZEmpC WN [2012] NZEmpC 140 [22 August 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2012] NZEmpC 140 WRC 2/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN MALCOLM FRENCH Plaintiff AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 4 and 19 July 2012 Judgment: 22 August 2012 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE...

8. LA v KD [2023] NZDT 260 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 260 APPLICANT LA RESPONDENT KD The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Reasons: 1. KD’s car hit the back of LA’s car on a very rainy day when the traffic on [highway] was slowing down because of another collision ahead. LA seeks an order that KD is liable to pay for the damage to LA’s car. KD says he...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 78 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...AHMED ALKAZAZ v ENTERPRISE IT LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 78 [26 May 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 78 EMPC 100/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to exclude or strike out evidence AND IN THE MATTER of an application t...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 165 Berryman v Fonterra Coopertive Group Ltd - Interlocutory [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZEmpC 165 EMPC 60/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN CARL BERRYMAN Plaintiff AND FONTERRA COOPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: E Lambert, advocate for plaintiff R Rend...