12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 516 APPLICANT OS and QS RESPONDENT D Ltd RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. OS and QS purchased a new caravan in July 2020 for $123,682.00 from D Ltd. The caravan came with a list of the chattels it included and a heater was on that list. OS and QS were concerned with the size of the he...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1434 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT ED The Tribunal hereby orders: ED is to pay KH $14,990.00 by Monday, 8 October 2018. Reasons 1. KH says ED cut down 76 trees on his (KH’s) property. They were originally 5 to 6 metres high and cut to between 1.2 and 1.4 metres. He is claiming $14,990.00 to replace the trees....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 732 APPLICANT KB RESPONDENT DC The Tribunal orders: DC is to pay KB $1,000.00 on or before Friday 26 January 2024. Reasons: 1. In late July 2023 KB saw a [car] (“the Car”) for sale on Trade Me and eventually purchased it from DC. DC lives in [Location 1], and KB in [Location 2]. KB had the Car freighted to [Location 2] a...
...THE AORERE COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES [2021] NZEmpC 154 [16 September 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 154 EMPC 404/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove proceedings to the Employment Court AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN MICHAEL ROBERT JACKSON Applicant AND THE AORERE COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Respondent...
IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 232 ARC 65/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out BETWEEN NANZHENG LIU Plaintiff AND SOUTH PACIFIC TIMBER (1990) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: Judge Christina Inglis By telephone conference on 10 December 2013 Appearances: Mr Hooker, counsel for the plaintiff Mr...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 523 APPLICANT O Homes Ltd RESPONDENTS BL and SL The Tribunal orders: Claim: BL and SL and jointly and severally liable to pay O Homes Ltd $3,904.38 within 28 days. Counterclaim: The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons [1] O Homes Ltd (“O Homes”), represented by director TM, claims $17,479.07 from BL and SL. The s...
...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 25 EMPC 413/2019 & 444/2019 IN THE MATTER OF matters removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of applications for stay of proceedings and security for costs BETWEEN SMITHS CITY (SOUTHERN) LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) Plaintiff AND JEREMY WALTER CLAXTON First Defendant AND CANDO CREATIVE FLOORING LIMITE...
...2. A Ltd says invoices for services provided to X Ltd are not fully paid. In the interests of resolving this dispute, A Ltd has discounted $1,063.15 across its three invoices, however an outstanding balance of $2,650.19 remains unpaid. A Ltd claims this sum. 3. X Ltd defends this claim saying A Ltd overcharged for its services and/or it enlarged the scope of cleaning work beyond what it was authorised to do by CL. 4. The issues I must decide are: a. What were the terms of...
1 | P a g e EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND PRACTICE DIRECTIONS 1. Front sheets .......................................................................................................................... 2 2. Applications to and communications with the Court .......................................................... 3 3. Provision of copies of authorities ........................................................................................ 4 4. Final submis
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 150 Ref: LCRO 107/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN NC Applicant AND PJ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] The applicant, Mr NC, has ap...