12990 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2011] NZDT 142 BETWEEN ACS APPLICANT AND ZXJ RESPONDENT Date of Order: 12 July 2011 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] The Respondent engaged the Applicant as the real estate agent for his property [in Auckland] and signed a sole agency agreement. The sole agency period ran from 12 November 2009 to 1...
...2013 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The plaintiff’s challenge is dismissed because of its failure to comply with an ‘unless’ order and generally for non-prosecution of the challenge. [2] The plaintiff filed a statement of claim and an application for stay of execution of the Authority’s determination 1 in early January 2013. There was no affidavit filed to support the application for stay as is expected in cases such as this. [3] By a minute issued on 10 Ja...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 921 BETWEEN DZ APPLICANT AND VA RESPONDENT AND VAV LTD SECOND RESPONDENT AND VAVU LTD THIRD RESPONDENT Date of Order: 9 June 2016 Referee: Referee Blyth ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that VAVU Ltd is to pay DZ the sum of $1,550.00 on or before 13 July 2016. Facts [1] DZ contracted VAV Ltd to arrange flights for her, her child and her infant to tr...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 793 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT P Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT QI and TI The Tribunal orders: The claim against QI and TI is dismissed. The claim against P Ltd is also dismissed. Reasons [1] DI purchased a house from QI and TI. Some time after the purchase, he discovered rot in windows and door framing, as well as defects in the fence and ga...
...Authority’s determination was issued on 4 August 2023. This meant that the 28-day time period within which a challenge could have been filed ended on 1 September 2023.4 No challenge was filed within that timeframe. Mr Halse, advocate for Ms Watkins, claimed that this was the result of a miscalculation on his part, together with a heavy workload. Ms Watkins’s leave application was eventually filed on 4 September 2023. [5] In a case where the statutory timeframe has elapsed,...
...v LANDCORP FARMING LIMITED T/A PĀMU [2025] NZEmpC 66 [3 April 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 66 EMPC 446/2024 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CARSTEN WEIDEMANN Applicant AND LANDCORP FARMING LIMITED T/A PĀMU Respondent Hearing:...
...since 2015 on temporary work visas. He is dyslexic and unable to score a high enough mark on the IELTS test to meet Immigration New Zealand’s written English threshold. [5] The complainant contacted Mr Wharekura for assistance with a residence application. The first meeting was on 16 May 2018. Mr Wharekura suggested that the complainant seek a special direction from the Minister of Immigration exempting him from the writing component of Immigration New Zealand’s English langu...
...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20130007857 UNDER Section 79, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tiroa E and Te Hape B Trusts BETWEEN WAYNE GLEN HOANI KATU Applicant AND HARDIE PENI Respondent Judgment: 7 September 2016 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD AS TO COSTS Copy to: Spencer Webster, Koning Web...
...Authority (the Authority), arises in the context of the disestablishment of Ms Bowen’s role with the BNZ at the end of July 2018. The issues, as identified by the Authority, cover various unjustified disadvantage and unjustified dismissal claims arising from allegations of: • bullying behaviours by a senior manager; • retaliatory conduct in respect of Ms Bowen’s protected disclosures; • being threatened with dismissal for seeking legal advice on the BNZ’s
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 294 APPLICANT TQ RESPONDENT WT Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT OQ Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER JB SECOND RESPONDENT INSURER RC Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. In May 2021 TQ returned to New Zealand after a long period overseas. He brought his personal effects including...