Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 170 Courage v Attorney-General [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 170 EMPC 363/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to access Court documents BETWEEN HOSEA COURAGE, DANIEL PILGRIM AND LEVI COURAGE Plaintiffs AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL SUED ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR INSPECTORATE...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 171 Hope v Attorney-General [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 171 EMPC 286/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application in relation to appointment of litigation guardian BETWEEN WORSHIP HOPE Plaintiff AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL sued on behalf of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Labour Inspectorate Fir...

3. Awakeri Hot Springs (2002) Ltd v Trustees of the Pukaahu Domain Trust - Pukaahu (2015) 130 Waiariki MB 140 (130 WAR 140) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...18(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Pukaahu (being Allotment 171-172 Parish of Rangitaiki, Allotment 173 Parish of Rangitaiki and Allotment 174 Parish of Rangitaiki BETWEEN AWAKERI HOT SPRINGS (2002) LIMITED Applicant AND TRUSTEES OF THE PUKAAHU DOMAIN WHĀNAU TRUST Respondents Hearing: 91 Waiariki MB 107-110, 3 March 2014 89 Waiariki MB 184-185, 20 January 2014 84 Waiariki MB 144-145, 9 October 2013 84 Waiariki MB 279-...

4. HBG v AJ Ltd [2024] NZDT 501 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 501 APPLICANT HBG RESPONDENT AJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. AJ Ltd is to pay $178.99 to HBG on or before 30 June 2024. 2. HBG is to make the damaged cargo bag available to AJ Ltd to collect at its cost. To be collected on or before 31 July 2024. 3. If, by 31 July 2024, AJ Ltd has not arranged for the cargo bag to be collected, despi...

5. Adams v ACC [2015] NZACA 3 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...Self-represented Counsel for the Respondent: P A McBride Date of Decision: __________________________________________________________________ DECISION __________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION [1] This is an application by Michael Adams for leave to appeal out of time to the Authority against the decision of a reviewer given on 5 May 1980. [2] The respondent Corporation accepts Mr Adams is covered by the applicable accident compensatio...

6. [2009] NZEmpC AC 48/09 Discount Crane Hire Ltd v Taljaard [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...(LABOUR INSPECTOR) Defendant Judgment: 9 December 2009 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] The defendant Labour Inspector, Mr Anton Taljaard, lodged a statement of problem in the Employment Relations Authority in February 2009 claiming under the Holidays Act 2003 against the plaintiff, Discount Crane Hire Limited (“DCHL”). Mr Taljaard sought to recover annual holiday pay for two former DCHL employees and a penalty of $10,000 for failing to pay out holiday pay...

7. TS v CT Ltd [2019] NZDT 1377 (25 July 2019) [pdf, 236 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1377 APPLICANT TS RESPONDENT CT Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: CT Limited is to pay the sum of $12,672.20 to TS on or before 15 August 2019; and CT Limited is to (at its own cost and at a time arranged with Ms S) remove the shed from Ms S's property within four weeks of the above amount being paid, including disco...

8. CL & HD v T Ltd & S Ltd [2023] NZDT 72 (14 February 2023) [pdf, 223 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 72 APPLICANT CL and HD RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay CL and HD $20,348.30 by Friday 17 March 2023. Reasons 1. The parties confirmed that the correct respondent is S Ltd. S Ltd was represented at the hearing by LT (the owner of S Ltd). 2. S Ltd replaced CL and HD’...

9. CU Ltd v ZS & HC Ltd [2023] NZDT 588 (24 November 2023) [pdf, 272 KB]

   Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 588 APPLICANT CU Ltd RESPONDENT ZS SECOND RESPONDENT HC Ltd The Tribunal orders: ZS & HC Ltd is to pay CU Ltd the sum of $10,684.41 in full, on or before 5pm Friday 22 December 2023. Reasons: 1. ZS director of HC Ltd (the Respondents) purchased products and services from CU Ltd in February 2022 to May 2022 valued at $11,817.52, and...

10. Saffioti & Anor v Ward & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 24 [pdf, 131 KB]

    ...any works which were insufficiently detailed were constructed in compliance with the Code. That qualification is significant because of JSAL’s acknowledgement that it knew its drawings were incomplete. e) JSAL’s submission as to the applicable case law regarding the claim against JSAL is inconsistent with the view expressed at paragraph [62] of the High Court judgment on appeal where the High Court held that the extracts from the first instance and Court of Appeal de...