Search Results

1. AED and AEE v ZVR [2010] NZDT 287 (26 November 2010) [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...2010 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZVR is to pay $2,789.90 to the Applicants within ten days of the date of this order. Facts [1] AED and AEE brought a claim against ZVR for the value of sheep killed, veterinary bills and associated expenses, following a dog attack (a total of $2,789.90). [2] Under s 63(1) of the Dog Control Act 1996, the owner of a dog is liable for damage done by the do...

2. Benioni - Succession to John Benjamin Karaitiana [2020] Chief Judges MB 1341 (2020 CJ 1341) [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...Karaitiana also known as John Benjamin Karaitiana or Leslie John Karaitiana and a succession order made at 319 Aotea MB 200-203 (28 April 2014) – Application to the Chief Judge I WAENGA I A Between SIMONE JUNE BENIONI Te kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 28 September 2020 (Heard at Whanganui via Zoom) Whakataunga: Judgment date 27 November 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā TE KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA W W ISAAC Judgment of Chief Judge W W Isaac...

3. Te Purei - Rahui A12D (2012) 25 Tairawhiti MB 272 (25 TRW 272) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...2012] IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRĀWHITI DISTRICT 25 Tairāwhiti MB 272 (25 TRW 272) A20120007384 UNDER Sections 43, 67 and 231 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rahui A12D - Rehearing of application for Review of Trust, Appointment of Trustee and Removal of Trustee BETWEEN PETER TE PUREI Applicant AND TRUSTEES OF RAHUI A12D AHU WHENUA TRUSTS Respondent Hearing: 3 October 2011, 17 Tairāwhiti MB 212 - 2...

4. Harawira v New Zealand Management Academies Limited & McAuley (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 59 [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...Member Dr M Koloamatangi, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr H Harawira (Puriri) in person Mr A Shankar for the defendants DATE OF HEARING: On the papers DATE OF DECISION: 13 November 2024 2 [1] Hone Puriri William Harawira, who has requested to be referred to as Puriri, filed this claim against New Zealand Management Academies Limited (NZMA) and Nigel McAuley on 12 February 2024. [2] Puriri claims both defendants discriminated against him on the grounds of his age...

5. [2020] NZSSAA 8 (30 April 2020) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...May 2019, she also raised other, broader issues. [8] We have given XXXX the opportunity to present the issues of substance that concern her. Background The District Court proceedings [9] The Ministry brought prosecutions against XXXX which form the background to these proceedings. On 28 April 2015, the Ministry told XXXX that it had information that she was in a de facto relationship which may affect her benefit. The Ministry referred to her request on 17 April 2015 for full...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 130 Packwood v ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 494 KB]

   ...ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2019] NZEmpC 130 EMPC 65/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out proceedings AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to extend time to file pleadings BETWEEN HELEN PACKWOOD Plaintiff AND ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant...

7. ML Ltd & PQ v ST & NT [2024] NZDT 534 (1 October 2024) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...2024. If FG has been spayed by the date of this order, ownership transfers to ST and NT. 4. The ownership of KL is to be transferred to ST and NT. 5. ML Limited is to pay ST and NT $750.00 on or before 6 September 2024. 6. The remainder of the claim by ML Limited is dismissed. 7. The remainder of the claim by ST and NT is dismissed. Reasons The name of the first Applicant was incorrectly spelt. This order rectifies that typographical error. The remainder of the order and the reas...

8. Smith v ACC [2014] NZACA 3 [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...based on nothing more than their estimate of what this should be. The Authority’s discretion under s 110 is wide and there is no scale of costs, but this does not mean that the Corporation, rather than the client, should pay for bringing their claims”. [13] That comment is applicable to the costs claims mounted by Mr Forster in both the review and the appeal. The propriety of contingency fees and the lack of professional controls over advocates as opposed to lawyers in such cases...

9. [2024] NZEmpC 49 Chantama v McKerchar Lamb Limited [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 49 EMPC 234/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to join a party BETWEEN ATTAPORN CHANTAMA Plaintiff AND MCKERCHAR LAMB LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P J Brown, counsel for plaintiff D McKerchar, agent for the def...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 139 Brown v Richard & Jennifer Adams t/a Untouchable Hair & Skin [pdf, 64 KB]

    ...the Authority regarding an NMIT invoice. The challenge was 1 Brown v Richard & Jennifer Adams t/a Untouchable Hair and Skin [2014] NZERA Christchurch 58. commenced by a statement of claim on 7 May 2014; Ms Brown filed a statement of defence on 10 June 2014. [3] In this proceeding (CRC 17/14), the applicant filed an application for leave to file a cross-challenge out of time on 10 June 2014 supported by two affidavits. T...