Search Results

1. Bonner v Accident Compensation Corporation (Rehabilitation) [2024] NZACC 164 (15 October 2024) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...2018, a TFI assessment conducted by Mr Kevin O’Leary, Occupational Therapist, outlined several transport options and identified various makes and models of potential vehicles. After considering Mr Bonner’s specific vehicle/seating requirements requests, Mr O’Leary considered that the vehicle that gave Mr Bonner the best seated position was a Jeep Grand Cherokee. There was no live request for an ATV at this time. 3 [8] In 2021, Mr Bonner commenced TFI assessment servic...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 212 Bali v SRG Holdings Ltd t/a Supervalue [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...plaintiff, Mr Bali, was complaining about events that took place subsequent to that determination and which also involved another company which, it is alleged, was to provide Mr Bali with an offer of employment as part of the settlement of Mr Bali’s claim against SRG Holdings Ltd. These matters were referred to in a minute I issued following the directions conference held on 15 August 2012. [2] Mr Bali subsequently brought his new issue before the Employment Relations Authorit...

3. [2023] NZIACDT 23 – ED v Dai (11 August 2023) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...Self-represented 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The adviser, Yuxiang Hendry Dai, was engaged by ED the complainant, to obtain a student visa for herself and a visitor visa for her husband. The complainant says she dealt only with the unlicensed FN and EI. The visa applications were duly filed but ultimately withdrawn, as Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) raised an issue about forged documents filed by the complainant on an earlier application. [2] A complaint by the complainant...

4. Ms E 21 July 2015 NZSHD 7 [pdf, 221 KB]

   [2015] NZSHD 7 SHD Number 15-021199 IN THE MATTER of the Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2004 AND IN THE MATTER an application by Ms E of Auckland pursuant to s.21 of the Act for a Certificate of Approval IN THE MATTER of an Objection by the New Zealand Police pursuant to s.25 of the Act BEFORE THE LICENSING AUTHORITY OF SECONDHAND DEALERS AND PAWNBROKERS HEARING at Papakura 29 June 2015 APPEARANCES Police Constable Harley...

5. [2007] NZEmpC AC 5A/07 Ali'imatafitafi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...investigation meeting took place on 29 May 2006. The Authority issued its determination on 15 June 2006. [3] The Employment Court hearing of the plaintiff’s challenge has been delayed due to difficulties with the plaintiff’s statements of claim and a series of applications by the defendant to have them struck out and the proceedings dismissed. These applications were dealt with in my judgment of 5 February 2007 (AC 5/07) which circumscribed the matters the plaintif...

6. Auckland City Council (as assignee) v Russell [pdf, 30 KB]

   Claim No: 1240 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim Between Auckland City Council (as assignee) Claimant And Mark Brian Russell Respondent Final Determination 14 February 2006 1. Index Para No Heading Page 1. Index 1 2. Summary of Determination 1 3. Quantification 1 2. Summary of Determination 2.1 In the Partial Determination dated 21 September 2005 I found that the Aucklan...

7. Fehling v Appleby (Bankruptcy) [2014] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 42 KB]

   ...Member Dr SJ Hickey, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr FJ Fehling in person Mr MM Bell for defendant DATE OF DECISION: 1 May 2014 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON THE EFFECT OF MR APPLEBY’S BANKRUPTCY Background [1] Mr Fehling’s statement of claim was filed on 19 November 2012. The document is not a model of clarity and the pleadings are not entirely clear. It would appear, however, that two claims are advanced: [1.1] That Mr Appleby breached the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA) in...

8. LCRO 175/2022 OP v VN (10 October 2023) [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...and 2.7 of the Rules and slandered Mr OP by alleging, at the December 2020 LCRO hearing, that Mr OP had threatened to kill the [City] bailiff, SU, when there was no basis for such allegation. [65] Mr OP says that he “challenged this baseless claim with the LCRO via email the next day” and “also raised it with the Law Society in my submissions”. [66] It is not the role of an LCRO to consider fresh complaints that are raised by a complainant on review. Whilst an LCRO has broa...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 60 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...immediately before the change, the party’s address for service. (3) The notice— (a) must be signed by the party personally or by the party’s attorney; and (b) in the case of a notice under subclause (1)(a) or (b), must contain the information about the new solicitor required by paragraphs (b) to (e) of rule 5.44(1); and (c) in the case of a party referred to in subclause (1)(c), must state that the party’s intention is to act in person. (4) For the purpose of the pro...

10. Turner v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 36 [pdf, 327 KB]

    .............................................................................. 51 What Contribution Should Each of the Liable Parties Pay? ......................... 51 Conclusion and Orders ................................................................................ 52 Timetable for Costs Applications .................................................................. 53 Page | 4 BACKGROUND [1] In November 2001, Nichola Tu...