12993 items matching your search terms
...NZDT 491 APPLICANT YD & YA RESPONDENT CU Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: CU Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,408.38 to YD & YA on or before 1 July 2024. Reasons: 1. The applicants YA and YD own a rental property in [suburb], which had been managed by CU Ltd since 2018. In February 2023, asbestos was discovered in the house, and the tenants gave notice a month later. The property could not be re-tenanted until...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 351 APPLICANT SQ RESPONDENT UI The Tribunal orders: Please email both parties this order. Both parties requested email address remain confidential for security reasons. They are not entered on this order. 1. This claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SQ and UI were in a short-term relationship during 2021. In...
...up as follows: a. Cost of repairs to ST’s vehicle $ 5,048.50 b. Reimbursement of Tribunal filing fee $ 180.00 c. Rounding $ 1.50 $ 5,230.00 3. The issues to be resolved are: a. Does clause 1 in the [Race] entry form preclude ST from pursuing a negligence claim against SC? b. If not, did SC fail in his duty to take reasonable care while racing? c. Is ST entitled to $5,230.00? Does clause 1 in the [Race] entry form preclude ST from pursuing a ne...
...workplace, marital and health related issues. In August 2014, the applicant’s GP treated her for migraines. Ultimately, she left her job, her marriage broke down, and in early 2015 she moved to Australia. [3] On 8 March 2019, an ACC injury claim form was filed for a sensitive claim said to relate to an event on 8 March 2014. The claim form indicated that the applicant preferred to have no contact with the Corporation and was not happy to discuss the matter on the telephone....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 514 APPLICANT EX RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 16 January 2024 EX purchased a bag that attaches to a bike from O Ltd after seeing the advisement on Trade Me. When the bag arrived he fixed it to his bike and noticed that it had a small cut in the fabric. He used the bag, and after...
...of the classes were not delivered while others were moved online. ML was happy to pay for the online classes, including some that her daughter did not attend, but sought a refund for the classes that were not delivered. OJ Ltd asked ML to sign a form on the back of the enrolment form before it would “process” her request for a refund. ML refused to sign the form, which contained terms regarding accepting a credit. OJ Ltd maintains that she is only entitled to a credit rather than a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 87 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT KB SECOND RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: A. X Ltd is added as Second Respondent. B. The claims are dismissed. Reasons 1. In August 2023, SI engaged X Ltd to clean her house before the settlement day for her sale of the house. KB is the director of the company. SI alleged that some...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 106 APPLICANT KN RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay $5,800.00 to T Ltd on or before 20 March 2023. REASONS Brief Details of Claims 1. KN owns a property at [Address]. KN submitted an Application for Resource Consent to subdivide the property into three lots. There was an existing house on the propo...
...recipient twice while another intended recipient did not receive a grant at all. [2] More importantly, the trustees also allege that two applicants for grants and scholarships, connected to one of the trustees, wilfully or negligently, made false applications when they knew or ought to have known that they were not entitled to do so. In addition, I infer, there appears to be a suggestion that one of the trustees, Sandra Matenga, may have facilitated this set of outcomes knowing tha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 8 APPLICANT EL RESPONDENT FO The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. EL contracted FO to make a 21st birthday cake for her daughter’s upcoming 21st birthday celebration. Discussions as to the icing requirements and design took place, mostly by text, with specific requests for blue ma...