ACG Ltd v ZXX Ltd [2011] NZDT 157 (9 May 2011) [pdf, 112 KB]
...respect, the argument is not whether or not the product was fit for purpose but rather whether or not the product supplied was in fact the product that was ordered in the first place. [10] The bulk of ACG Ltd’s claim for compensation comprises consequential losses arising out of rebottling affected product. RT argued that ZXX Ltd’s terms and conditions, which ACG Ltd agreed to when it applied for a trading account with ZXX Ltd, expressly excludes liability for indirect and c...