Search Results

1. LCRO 75/2017, 210/2017 and 212/2017 SW v HB (31 October 2018) [pdf, 425 KB]

   ...balance of probabilities with reference to the Act and the rules made under it. The Act [128] Section 3 sets out the purposes of the Act which are: (a) to maintain public confidence in the provision of legal services… (b) to protect the consumers of legal services… (c) to recognise the status of the legal profession… [129] Section 4 sets out the fundamental obligations of lawyers who provide regulated services. It says that every lawyer must, in the course of his or he...

2. [2007] National Distribution Union Inc v General Distributors Ltd AK AC 7/07 [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...[60] Although not doing so exhaustively, the definitions of good faith dealings given in s4 address what might be referred to as the honesty or transparency of dealings between parties so that deceiving and misleading, whether intentional or consequential, are prohibited. Good faith dealings between parties in the specified relationships also require “active and constructive” conduct “in establishing and maintaining a productive employment relationship in which the parties ar...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 238 Coast Road Resilience Group Inc v West Coast Regional Council [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...Metals Limited to undertake open cast mineral sands mining and processing over 12 years at a site on Barrytown Flats, State Highway 6, West Coast.2 CRRGI appealed seeking that the decision be overturned and consents refused or any further or consequential relief as may be necessary to address the matters it raised in its submission and appeal. 1 Reference WCRC: RC-2023-0046 and GDC: LUN-3154/23. 2 Independent Commissioners’ Decision on Application by TiGa Minerals and Metals L...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 166 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...the restricted discretionary activity Ideal Laundry Limited v Pe tone Borough (1957] NZLR 1038 (CA) at 1054. Auckland Regional Council v North Shore City Council [1995] NZRMA 424 (CA) at [431]-[432]. 42 rules for water takes; and (6) make consequential changes to maps. Only the primary allocation limit and associated minlmum flow-that is (1) and (2)- are now in issue in this proceeding. As noted, PCSA also contemplated a change to Chapter 6 itself: the addition of a reference...

5. [2017] NZEnvC 088 Save Wanaka Lakefront Reserve Inc v Queenstown District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...Minute dated 27 March 2017. 6 (a) an adjustment to the building footprint to position the building's front wall approximately 1.5m further back from the lakeside, but keeping the building footprint within the proposed lease area; (b) consequential adjustment of the position of the boardwalk in that part where it is presently closest to that lakeside boundary (referred to in evidence as the "pinch point") such as to bring it further back from that position given...

6. [2017] NZEnvC 088 Save Wanaka Lakefront Reserve Inc v Queenstown District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...Minute dated 27 March 2017. 6 (a) an adjustment to the building footprint to position the building's front wall approximately 1.5m further back from the lakeside, but keeping the building footprint within the proposed lease area; (b) consequential adjustment of the position of the boardwalk in that part where it is presently closest to that lakeside boundary (referred to in evidence as the "pinch point") such as to bring it further back from that position given...

7. 2021-02-19 Tom de Pelsemaeker - Reply - Planning - Recommended decisions on submissions (19 Feb 2021) [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...seeking the long-term consents that they need, as many have done already. Reject All Plan Change 7 71143 71143.03 Trustpower Limited Not stated In addition, Trustpower seeks any such other relief that addresses Trustpower’s submission and/or is consequential to making the above amendments. Reject FS706 Horticulture New Zealand Oppose Accept FS714 Aukaha Ltd Support in part Reject All Plan Change 7 144 71144 71144.01 The Burn Limited Oppose Continue to process permits under the exi...

8. Tom De Pelsemaeker - ORC Final Evidence-in-Reply - Recommended Decisions on Submissions (25 June 2021) [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...seeking the long-term consents that they need, as many have done already. Reject All Plan Change 7 71143 71143.03 Trustpower Limited Not stated In addition, Trustpower seeks any such other relief that addresses Trustpower’s submission and/or is consequential to making the above amendments. Reject FS706 Horticulture New Zealand Oppose Accept FS714 Aukaha Ltd Support in part Reject All Plan Change 7 144 71144 71144.01 The Burn Limited Oppose Continue to process permits under the exi...

9. Annexure 7 - Decisions on Submissions [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...long-term consents that they need, as many have done already. Reject 17 All Plan Change 7 71143 71143.03 Trustpower Limited Not stated In addition, Trustpower seeks any such other relief that addresses Trustpower’s submission and/or is consequential to making the above amendments. Accept in part FS706 Horticulture New Zealand Oppose Accept in part FS714 Aukaha Ltd Support in part Accept in part All Plan Change 7 144 71144 71144.01 The Burn Limited...

10. 2021-04-13 Transcript (up to end of day 15) [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...I have reproduced Tables 1 to 5 from my evidence-in-chief with corrections 10 made. Those corrections pertain to paragraph 45 and 61 of Mr Leslie’s evidence in reply. Tables 1 to 5 are contained in Appendix A to this summary of evidence. Consequential changes to the text of my evidence-in-chief may be required due to corrections to Table 1 to 5. Given the technical nature of these changes and the fact that Plan 15 Change 7 and Schedule 10A.4 has moved on, I have not updated...