Search Results

Search results for costs.

20146 items matching your search terms

  1. [2010] NZEmpC 133 Mercer v Maori Television Service [pdf, 82 KB]

    ...His challenge succeeds. Remedies [73] At the commencement of the hearing Ms Eden advised that reinstatement was no longer sought and that Mr Mercer was seeking compensation for lost wages, loss of dignity and injury to feelings as well as costs. [74] Mr Mercer gave very brief evidence in support of his claim for reimbursement. He claimed that he was earning approximately $53,000 per annum when he was working at MTS and since that time he had only managed to earn be...

  2. [2019] NZEnvC 176 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Inc v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 27 MB]

    ...consistent with the spirit and intent of the Reasons below; or (2) to the court to resolve the other jurisdictional/procedural issues argued at the hearing. Any applicant must give detailed grounds as to why that resolution is necessary. C: Costs are reserved. Table of Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introduction [1 l 1.1 The general issue and the parties [1] 1.2 The issues, the plan changes and the outstanding natural landscape at [12] Arthurs Point 1.3 The UCESI submis...

  3. Appendix 2 Draft Annex to 23rd-24th Reports under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [pdf, 420 KB]

    ...CERD/C/NZL/23-24 9 Table 7: Progress so far on the Act’s three primary measures of child poverty 5 Measures Baseline year (2017/18) First year (2018/19) Second year (2019/20) Change (17/18 to 19/20) Before- housing- cost measure of low income (BHC50) Rate (%) 16.5 13.5 13.8 -2.7 Children 183,400 153,200 157,800 -25,600 After- housing- cost measure of low income (AHC50) Rate (%) 22.8 18.3 18.4 -4.4 Children 253,800 207,700 210,500 -43,300...

  4. [2019] NZEnvC 029 Cable Bay Wines Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

    ...adjacent to the original restaurant; Cable Bay Wines Limited & Motukaha Investments Limited v Auckland Council 2 D. Refusal of that part of the original application relating to outdoor hospitality, excepting Band C above, is confirmed. E. Costs remain reserved. REASONS Introduction [1] This appeal was against refusal by Auckland Council of a retrospective resource consent application for unconsented activities on the appellants' (collectively called "Cable Bay...

  5. [2019] NZEnvC 102 Hawkes Bay Fish Game Council v Hawkes Bay Regional Council [pdf, 9 MB]

    ...allowed the appeal to the limited extent described in that decision, but otherwise declined it. The court issued directions for the HBRC to report with a timetable for providing updated provisions for approval. [3] The court issued a decision as to costs on 8 March 2019. 3 [4] This final decision relates to the only outstanding matter, the updated set of provisions required to implement the court's decisions. [5] On 7 November 2018, the HBRC lodged a memorandum with amended...

  6. [2018] NZEnvC 132 Caradoc-Davies v S R Clearwater [pdf, 11 MB]

    ...materials). [40] I hope that these findings will delimit spatial issues and guide the parties in further exploring resolution of the enforcement proceedings, whether by negotiation, settlement conference methodology, or hearing in open court. [41] Costs are reserved. LJ Newhook Principal Environment Judge .'-- --- i i .I / / "' ..... , ~ / " fill 'dl.posoTaI"Cl'IO nlbc.p:uJdoc:k 1e",:1 . . - ,'mpMtd.wcllaatl,phan...

  7. Waxman v Pal (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2017] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 322 KB]

    ...restraining order in the District Court against Mr Crouch under the Harassment Act 1997. Not only did she fail in that application, Judge Sharp considered it was Dr Waxman who had been doing the harassing, had been vexatious and ordered indemnity costs against her. Dr Waxman appealed. Although self-represented in the District Court, Dr Waxman was represented in the High Court by experienced counsel. [30] Palmer J upheld Judge Sharp’s judgment declining the application for a restra...

  8. [2024] NZEnvC 213 Remediation (NZ) Limited v Taranaki Regional Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...Community Parties Ms S Ongley for Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Mutunga Date of Decision: 30 August 2024 Date of Issue: 30 August 2024 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The appeal is refused, and consent therefore also refused. B: Costs are reserved. Any application is to be made within 15 working days of this decision; response(s) within a further 15 working days. Contents The proposal, the site and the applications ........................................................

  9. Barcello v Barcello - Succession to Mary Barcello (2024) 91 Te Waipounamu MB 77 (91 TWP 77) [pdf, 329 KB]

    ...specifically asked whether the ‘other two’ children had consented – that is an indication that if they had not consented then the transactions might not have gone through at all or would only have done so after considerably more effort, time and cost. I do not consider these are minor contributions to the acquisition by Mary, or ultimately Mark and Sharon, of the Anatohia shares. [56] In addition, Owen gave evidence that he had assisted in helping Mark build his whare and had...