20144 items matching your search terms
...counsel to consider in due course. Decision [29] The application for confirmation of alienation of the shares of Sydney Margaret Loach in Matarikoriko No 7B2 to David and Christine Jury is dismissed. [30] There will be no order as to costs. Pronounced at am/pm in on this day of 2013 L R Harvey JUDGE 15 For examples see Craig v Kira - Wainui 2F4D (2006) 7 Taitokera...
...this matter has been before the Court. [38] Finally, while there has been some support from the community, they do not own the land. The owners do. Order [39] Taking into account the Preamble ss 2, and 17, the application is dismissed and costs are to lie where they fall. Pronounced in Open Court at 1pm in Gisborne on this 27 th day of July 2015. C L Fox DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE
...privilege or litigation privilege, or both. The documents identified in the schedule are to be disclosed to the plaintiff within seven days of the date of this judgment. [47] Each party has been partially successful only; my provisional view is that costs should lie where they fall in respect of this interlocutory application. If either party wishes to submit otherwise, however, they should file an appropriate memorandum and evidence 14 days after the date of this judgment; the o...
...(a) to provide information to members of the public who have questions about discrimination; and (b) to facilitate the resolution of disputes about compliance with Part 1A or Part 2, by the parties concerned, in the most efficient, informal, and cost-effective manner possible. (2) The Commission has, in order to carry out its function under subsection (1)(b), the following functions: (a) to receive and assess a complaint alleging that there has been a breach of Part 1A or Part 2, or...
...however I am unable to fault what Dr Murray has done and I therefore must find on the balance of probabilities that the appellant has failed to show that ACC’s decision is wrong. The appeal is therefore dismissed. [68] I make no order as to costs. CJ McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: Schmidt and Peart Law, Ellerslie Young Hunter, Solicitors, Christchurch
...internal NZPPTA emails in response are relevant and are not protected from disclosure by “without prejudice” privilege. The parties already have Ms Borrell’s email. The two internal emails are to be produced to the defendants forthwith. [46] Costs are reserved. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 3.30 pm on 13 February 2013
...CIV-2009-404-3118, 11 December 2009 at [21]. 2 Saffioti v Jim Stephenson Architect Ltd [2012] NZHC 2519 at [44]. 3 Lee v Auckland Council [2015] NZHC 1196. 4 extra gate keeping role to ensure that adjudication proceedings progress in an expeditious and cost effective way.4 However, Wylie J in Lee warned that the discretion conferred by s 112 of the Act needs to be exercised with caution. [14] Brewer J in Auckland Council v Abraham stated that the discretion conferred by s...
...I raised with counsel whether mediation should be directed by this Court. There was no consensus as to that possibility. However, the Authority’s direction stands and mediation should therefore proceed. [53] The defendant is entitled to costs, which I reserve. If the parties are unable to resolve this issue directly, a memorandum and evidence should be filed and served 20 working days after the date of this decision; and a memorandum in reply and evidence if any should be fi...
...order. However, Mr Cranney confirmed to the Court that a declaration only would suffice at this stage. I assume the parties will now be able to resolve the issue of payment without the necessity of such an order being made. [105] I reserve costs, which the parties should, in the first instance, seek to resolve. If necessary, I will receive memoranda. B A Corkill Judge Judgment signed at 12.15 pm on 7 September 2022
...residential dwellings on Category 3 land. The overarching objective of the Policy is the removal of risk-to-life associated with people living on Category 3 land. [5] The operation of the Voluntary Buy-Out Policy, which is funded on a 50:50 cost share basis by the Councils and the Crown, provides financial assistance to affected landowners to move away from Category 3 land. However there remains the issue of where the owners can move to, particularly given a strong desire amongst...