20144 items matching your search terms
...determining that Mr Daly was not entitled to interest on a backdated payment of weekly compensation, was correct. [48] The decision of the Reviewer dated 10 March 2021 is therefore upheld. This appeal is dismissed. [49] I make no order as to costs. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors for the Respondent: Medico Law.
...agreement reached shortly beforehand. The factors pointing in the opposite direction are relevant, but must be viewed in context. [56] The challenge to the Authority’s preliminary determination is dismissed. [57] The parties are urged to agree costs. If that does not prove possible, the defendant may file and serve submissions and material in support within a period of 30 days from the date of this judgment, with Mr D’Arcy-Smith filing and serving within a further 15 days....
...period 28 May 1990 to 23 May 2008; and that the Corporation correctly declined his claim for this payment. [55] The decision of the Reviewer dated 29 July 2022 is therefore upheld. [56] This appeal is dismissed. [57] I make no order as to costs. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors for the Respondent: Medico Law.
...accordance with tikanga Māori. [46] Piripi Te Maari is entitled to a life interest to the interests held by Eileen Kīngi that were derived from her father-in-law, Kaipaki Kīngi. [47] As both parties were assisted by the Special Aid Fund, no issues of costs arise. Ka pānuitia te whakataunga i te Kooti kei Rotorua a te toru karaka o te rā rua tekau ma toru o Tihema i te tau 2020 Pronounced in Rotorua at 3pm on this 23rd day of December 2020 L R Harvey JUDGE...
...Reply, and will be more effective in achieving that intent. For that reason I support the amendments proposed to Objective 10A.1.1, Policy 10A.2.1 and Rules 10A.3. In particular: (a) I consider the amendments to Rule 10A.3.1.1 will reduce the costs to applicants of taking the controlled activity pathway; (b) I support removal of Rule 10A.3.1A.1(b) and the associated wording 1 Sandra McIntyre, Evidence in Chief paragraphs 81-82...
...finding the heitiki is to be acknowledged appropriately in any documentary record relevant to its history but the detail and extent of that recognition will be a matter for the parties to consider in due course. [36] There will be no order as to costs. Pronounced in open Court at 2.15 pm in Rotorua on this 4 th day of May 2012 L R Harvey JUDGE
...weeks on whether the trustees conduct amounts to a contempt and if so, set out what the appropriate remedies might be in the circumstances of these proceedings. [39] Leave is reserved for any party to seek further directions at any time. [40] Costs are reserved. Pronounced in Hastings at 4.00pm on Wednesday this 30th day of January 2019. L R Harvey JUDGE
...and use of the FUZ (rural zone) , subject to appropriate assessment against the Plan’s objectives and policies, and environmental effects. The Council has failed to undertake an adequate assessment of the provisions, including the benefits and costs of the environmental, economic, social and cultural effects that are anticipated from the implementation of the provisions, as required by sections 32 and 32AA of the RMA. c. There is no s.32AA evaluation for these decisions to change...
...required timeframe in accordance with Order 1 (h) above, the First Respondent shall cease discharging contaminants into air from the Property from that date. 2. The Respondents will : (a) Be jointly and severally liable for the actual and reasonable costs incurred by the Regional Council in ensuring compliance with these enforcement orders; and (b) Comply with these enforcement orders from the time they are made and continue complying with these enforcement orders unless they ar...
...it has no application to issues relating to training or training entitlement. [29] No doubt because the case relates to the interpretation of a provision in a collective employment agreement, the defendant, quite responsibly, has not sought costs. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 11.30 am on 2 November 2011