Search Results

Search results for costs.

20134 items matching your search terms

  1. Government Response to Law Commision Report on New Issues in Legal Parenthood [pdf, 36 KB]

    ...Government disagrees with the Commission’s recommendation that parents and donors should be required to receive independent legal advice before having agreements about the donor’s role made into court orders. The Government does not consider the cost to parties justifies the benefit. Parties are increasingly participating in the Family Court in cases that are just as complex, without such a requirement being imposed on them. Information about parenting agreements and orders is already av...

  2. BORA Social Security Amendment Bill [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...cancelled where both members of the couple fail to meet their obligations, whereas if the couple have dependent children, the suspension or cancellation affects only half of the benefit. 39 We consider that this distinction is justifiable because it costs more to support a family than it does to support a couple. Suspending the total benefit for a family on welfare would cause considerable hardship, and the limited financial assistance the beneficiaries would receive during a suspension...

  4. McLennan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Gradual Process Injury) [2023] NZACC 54 [pdf, 254 KB]

    ...this case. [34] The Court therefore finds that Mr McLennan qualifies for cover for a work- related gradual process injury. This appeal is allowed, and the review decision dated 13 January 2022 is set aside. [35] Mr McLennan is entitled to costs. If these cannot be agreed within one month, I shall determine the issue following the filing of memoranda. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors: Schmidt & Peart Law for the Appellant Young Hunter...

  5. [2022] NZACC 68 – Broughton v ACC (28 April 2022) [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...medical evidence in support (noted above), outweighs the medical evidence arising out of the paper-based assessments to the contrary. [49] The appeal is therefore allowed, and the review decision is set aside. [50] Mr Broughton is entitled to costs. If these cannot be agreed within one month, I shall determine the issue following the filing of memoranda. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors: Ford Sumner, Wellington, for the respondent....

  7. [2015] NZEmpC 199 Ganley v PB Sea-Tow (NZ) Limited [pdf, 141 KB]

    ...the Court has no power to improve a contract, however desirable the improvement might be seen to be. 15 Conclusion [56] The plaintiff’s challenge to the Authority’s determination is dismissed. [57] The parties are encouraged to agree costs. If that does not prove possible the defendant may file and serve memoranda and any supporting material within 30 days of the date of this judgment with the plaintiff filing and serving anything in response within a further 20 days....

  8. Arndt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Appeal) [2022] NZACC 244 [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...evidence to conclude that Mr Arndt’s cancers were caused by his exposure to TEL/TML or any other toxic chemical. [46] The decision of the Reviewer dated 22 March 2019 is therefore upheld. This appeal is dismissed. [47] I make no order as to costs. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors for the appellant: Armstrong Thompson.

  9. [2022] NZEnvC 005 Northlake Investments Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 231 KB]

    ...be submitted to the Manager of Resource Management Engineering at Council for review, prior to acceptance being issued. At Council’s discretion, specific designs may be subject to a Peer Review, organised by the Council at the applicant’s cost. The ‘Engineering Review and Acceptance’ application(s) shall include copies of all specifications, calculations, design plans and Schedule 1A design certificates as is considered by Council to be both necessary and adequate, in acco...