Search Results

1. DML v Montgomery (Costs) [2014] NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Ms M Sinclair, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr RW Kee, Director of Human Rights Proceedings Mr DG Dewar for First and Second Defendants DATE OF DECISION: 6 May 2014 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS APPLICATION BY PLAINTIFF 2 Background [1] These proceedings were heard over three days on 5, 6 and 7 March 2012. The plaintiff was represented by the Director of Human Rights Proceedings under s 90(1) of the Human Rights Act 1...

2. BORA Ombudsmen (Cost Recovery) Amendment Bill [pdf, 118 KB]

   LEGAL ADVICE LPA 01 01 21 29 March 2017 Hon Christopher Finlayson QC, Attorney-General Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Ombudsmen (Cost Recovery) Amendment Bill 1. We have considered whether the Ombudsmen (Cost Recovery) Amendment Bill (‘the Bill’), a member’s Bill in the name of Hon David Parker, is consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (‘the Bill of Rights Act’). 2. The Bill amends the Ombu...

3. Application Consent to Employ COSTS [2012] NZLCDT 6 [pdf, 9 KB]

   ...Mr I Williams HEARING at AUCKLAND on 21 February 2012 APPEARANCES Mr G W Calver for the Applicants Mr P Collins for the New Zealand Law Society 2 DECISION OF NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL ON COSTS [1] The Tribunal has considered submissions from both parties. In the circumstances of this case we consider costs should lie where they fall. DATED at AUCKLAND this 3rd day of April 2012 __________________ Judge D F Clarks...

4. 1982 Official Information Act charging guidelines [pdf, 28 KB]

   ...of 26 February 1992. They are provided for Government Departments, Crown Entities, State-owned Enterprises and all other organisations which are subject to the Official Information Act 1982. They represent what the Government regards as reasonable charges for the purposes of the Official Information Act and should be followed in all cases unless good reason exists for not doing so. Organisations covered by the Act who wish to develop their own charging regimes should be aware that charges are...

5. Waxman v Pal (Costs) [2017] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...DEBORAH WAXMAN PLAINTIFF AND JITENDRA PAL DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr D Waxman in person Dr J Pal in person DATE OF COSTS HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR COSTS: 25 January 2017 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON APPLICATION BY DEFENDANT FOR COSTS 1 Introduction [1] In Waxman v Pal [2016] NZHRRT 28 (11 August 2016...

6. Cost Benefit Analysis: AML Phase 2 [pdf, 105 KB]

   1 | CBAx, AML Phase II, Ministry of Justice, February 2017 Cost Benefit Analysis: AML Phase 2 Section A Descriptive Information Problem Definition The Phase I anti-money laundering regime came into force in 2013, which covered banks, insurance companies, financial services (e.g. investment advisers), money remitters and casinos. There is now a proposal to extend the scope AML legislation to cover additional sectors, to bring NZ in line with its FATF obligations. The Phase II se...

7. Draft Cost Benefit Analysis: AML Phase II [pdf, 296 KB]

   1 | CBAx, AML Phase II, Ministry of Justice, October 2016 Draft Cost Benefit Analysis: AML Phase II Section A Descriptive Information Problem Definition The Phase I anti-money laundering regime came into force in 2013, which covered banks, insurance companies, financial services (e.g. investment advisers), money remitters and casinos. There is now a proposal to extend the scope AML legislation to cover additional sectors, to bring NZ in line with its FATF obligations. The...

8. Draft Cost Benefit Analysis: AML Phase II [pdf, 281 KB]

   1 | CBAx, AML Phase II, Ministry of Justice, October 2016 Draft Cost Benefit Analysis: AML Phase II Section A Descriptive Information Problem Definition The Phase I anti-money laundering regime came into force in 2013, which covered banks, insurance companies, financial services (e.g. investment advisers), money remitters and casinos. There is now a proposal to extend the scope AML legislation to cover additional sectors, to bring NZ in line with its FATF obligations. The...

9. Form-A-Costs-Orders.doc [doc, 40 KB]

   Form A NOTICE OF APPEAL RELATING TO COSTS ORDERS Part 6, Criminal Procedure Act 2011 In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand – I te Kōti Pīra o Aotearoa [Name] v [R or Police or prosecutor] Name of appellant: …………………………………………………………………………….. Decision being appealed: ……………………………………………………………………… Date of decision: ……………………………………………………………�€...

10. Form 49 Application for Charging Order without Notice [docx, 24 KB]

    This editable form has been updated to reflect the new District Court Act 2016 Form 49 Application for charging order without notice [bookmark: _Hlk85035353]In the District Court at Choose an item. No: [number of proceeding] Between [name] (judgment creditor) And [name] (judgment debtor) To the Registrar 1 The judgment creditor/duly authorised agent of the judgment creditor* applies to the District Court at [place] for the making of a charging order under section 184 of the District Court...