20144 items matching your search terms
...NZEmpC 22 [14 February 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 22 ARC 46/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN CANDYLAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND JO-ANNE JARVIS Defendant Hearing: By submissions dated 28 November, 5 December, 10 December and 1 January 2014 Appearances: Michele Coker, agent for...
...Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 2 August 2023 ___________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J MCGUIRE AS TO COSTS ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] Following the appellant’s successful appeal in this case, Ms Howell’s lay advocate, Mr Stryder, seeks costs of a total of $9,845. [2] It appears t...
...pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN DH Applicant AND EI (deceased) Respondent SUPPLEMENTARY DECISION AS TO COSTS Introduction [1] On 12 May 2017, I issued a decision (the decision) in which I confirmed the determination by [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) to take no further action in respect of Mr DH’s conduct prior to the issu...
Resource Consent charge form Cultural Heritage Implementation Charge form for resource consent internal specialist input Reporting officer/admin support - Please add charges below to this applicatio
...right to express caution about applying the conventional civil costs regime to its jurisdiction. Statutory tribunals exist to provide simpler, speedier, more affordable and more accessible justice than do the ordinary courts. The imposition of large fees to bring a claim and the imposition of adverse costs orders would undermine the affordability and accessibility long recognised as important advantages of tribunals over courts. See [61]. [9.5] The Tribunal was correct to regard HRA,...
...WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms J Foster, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr G Robins for plaintiff Both defendants unrepresented and did not file submissions on costs DATE OF HEARING: 18 to 21 November 2019 DATE OF SUBSTANTIVE DECISION: 2 March 2022 DATE OF DECISION OF COSTS: 22 August 2022 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 1 [This decision is to be cited as Beauchamp v B...
...did not appear at the hearing – finding that plaintiff had pursued tactics to ensure proceedings as difficult and protracted as he could make them – rejection of reasonable and responsible settlement offer – successful defendant incurred fees of $25,268.63 plus disbursements of $502.23 but indemnity costs not sought – defendant sought $13,130 and disbursements of $502.23. $13,632.23 (18 September 2013) [13] Compared with these cases an award of $15,000 plus disbursement...
...COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: K Koloni for the Appellant P McBride for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment: 8 August 2023 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs on appeal] Introduction [1] The substantive matter in this appeal relates to the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 November 2021. The Reviewer dismissed Ms Mollet’s applications for review: (a) of the Corporation’s decisi...
...CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Representatives: K Koloni for the Appellant P McBride for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment: 3 February 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This judgment concerns costs relating to Ms Stewart’s appeal which was upheld by the Court.1 In a judgment on 10 October 2022, the Court noted that, having succeeded...