20146 items matching your search terms
...171 [17 September 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 171 ARC 91/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN JAN SUSAN BRACEWELL Plaintiff AND RICHMOND SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by documents filed on 16 July and 29 July 2014) Counsel: Dr J Cook, agent for the plaintiff P...
...Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mrs K Apostolakis in person Mr RS May and Ms R Kós for first defendant Mr C Matsis for second defendant Mr SN Meikle in person DATE OF STRIKE-OUT DECISION: 17 January 2019 DATE OF DECISION ON COSTS: 4 March 2019 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Apostolakis v Attorney-General No. 3 (Costs) [2019] NZHRRT 11.] 2 Introducti...
...Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: K Koloni for the Appellant J Castle for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 13 February 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs on appeal - Part 14 District Court Rules 2014] Introduction [1] The parties in this matter have settled this appeal, with the exception of costs, which have not been agreed. Background [2] On 6 August 2021, Dr Gil Newburn provid...
KATZ V MANA COACH SERVICES LTD NZEmpC WN [2011] NZEmpC 88 [18 July 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2011] NZEmpC 88 WRC 42/10 IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN BEATRICE KATZ Plaintiff AND MANA COACH SERVICES LTD Defendant Hearing: On the papers (in response to memoranda filed on 7 and 22 June 2011) Counsel: Tanya Kennedy, counsel for the plaintiff Blair Scotland, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 18 July 2011...
...misleading, punitive, and aimed at discrediting him. [5] I start with a consideration of the actual costs incurred by the defendant. The Court of Appeal has made it clear that it is not mandatory for counsel to provide details of time involved and charge out rates when seeking costs. In Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd it observed that: 4 Obviously this kind of information may help, and its absence may invite a degree of caution, but in the end the Court, when considering whether...
...Mr CG Tuck for plaintiff Mr S O’Sullivan and Mr M Booth for first defendant Mr DS McGill for second defendant Mr I Millard QC and Mr B Cullen for third and fourth defendants DATE OF STRIKE-OUT DECISION: 11 May 2018 DATE OF DECISION ON COSTS: 19 June 2018 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Kapiarumala v New Zealand Catholic Bishops Conference (Costs) [2018] NZHRRT 24] 2 Introduct...
...Sinclair, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr R Small for Plaintiffs Mr GR La Hood for Defendant Ms K Evans for Privacy Commissioner DATE OF HEARING: 28, 29 and 30 May 2012; 11 and 12 July 2012 DATE OF DECISION: 17 April 2014 DATE OF DECISION ON COSTS: 12 August 2014 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS 2 The substantive decision [1] In a decision given by the Tribunal on 17 April 2014 each party enjoyed a measure of success and of failure. The plaintiffs succeeded in their...
...175 [5 October 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 175 EMPC 217/2014 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN ABLE OWL XL LIMITED Plaintiff AND NEIL GLADDEN Defendant Hearing: By costs memoranda filed on 30 September and 2 October 2015 Appearances: E Burke, counsel for plaintiff N Gladden, defend...
...Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented J Maslin-Caradus for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 2 April 2025 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Costs of appeal] Introduction [1] This judgment concerns a claim for costs and disbursements in relation to an appeal where the substantive issue has been resolved. Background [2] The issue in this appeal was whether the Corporatio...
...AND RICHMOND SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers dated 9, 18 and 19 May 2015) Representation: Dr J Cook, agent for the plaintiff P Shaw, counsel for defendant Judgment: 4 June 2015 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] On 11 May 2015 Ms Bracewell filed a memorandum in which she informed the Court that she wished to withdraw her application for a rehearing. She said she would instead pursue her concer...