Search Results

1. Haupini v SRCC Holdings Ltd (Application by Defendant for Costs) [2013] NZHRRT 23 [pdf, 104 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 23 Reference No. HRRT 027/2010 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE DEFENDANT FOR COSTS BETWEEN CLAIRE HINEKOIA IRENE HAUPINI PLAINTIFF AND SRCC HOLDINGS LIMITED DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr GJ Cook JP, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr SRG Judd for Plaintiff Mr E St John for Defendant DA...

2. [2017] NZEnvC 101 D B Ellis v Porirua City Council Costs [pdf, 416 KB]

   ...the papers: In Chambers at Wellington Counsel: S F Quinn for D BEllis J G A Winchester and H P Harwood for Porirua City Council Date of Decision: 7 July 2017 Date of Issue: 10 JUF2U17i,,; DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON APPLICATION FOR COSTS A: Under section 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court orders that Porirua City Council is to pay $5,500 to Mr DB Ellis. B: Under section 286 of the Resource Management Act 1991, the District Court Welling...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 69 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 69 EMPC 397/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN AHMED ALKAZAZ Plaintiff AND ENTERPRISE IT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Plaintiff in person R Bryant, counsel for defendant Judgment: 22 April 2022 COSTS...

4. [2023] NZEnvC 072 Whangarei District Council v Robinson [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...papers Last Case Event: 11 April 2023 Submissions: By the respondent dated 20 March 2023 and 10 April 2023 By the applicant dated 6 April 2023 Date of Decision: 27 April 2023 Date of Issue: 27 April 2023 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS A: Under s 285 Resource Management Act 1991 the Environment Court declines the application by Mr Robinson for costs against Whangarei District Council. 2 B: Costs are to lie where they fall. REASONS Introduction On 2 Dec...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 160 Evans v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 276 KB]

   EVANS v MDC – COSTS IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 160 IN THE MATTER of the Biosecurity Act 1993 AND an application under s76 of the Act BETWEEN GEOFFREY IAN TUDOR EVANS (ENV-2020-CHC-105) Applicant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Hearing: On the papers Last case event: 21 June 2024 Date of Decision: 4 July 2024 Date of Issue: 4 July 2...

6. Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre (Costs) [2021] NZHRRT 57 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Ms R Oakley for plaintiff Ms N Flint for defendant Mr J Goddard for Ms Abraham as second defendant (removed) DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 20 December 2021 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 INTRODUCTION [1] Following a three-day hearing from 6 to 8 July 2020 the Tribunal, in Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10, upheld Ms Cook’s claim of an interference with her privacy and awarded damages of $6,000 a...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 205 Rosemarke Investments Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...papers Last case event: 5 May 2024 Submissions: KRM Littlejohn and S Hiew for Rosemarke Investments Ltd R Russ for Auckland Council Date of Decision: 26 August 2024 Date of Issue: 26 August 2024 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS A: Under s 285 of the RMA, Rosemarke Investments Limited is ordered to pay $16,000 in costs to Auckland Council B: Under s 286 of the RMA, this order is enforceable in the District Court at Auckland. 2 REASONS Background...

8. [2022] NZREADT 22 — QQ v REAA (CAC 1902) & NQ (25 October 2022) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...Chair) G J Denley (Member) Representation: The appellant: Self-represented Counsel for the first respondent: M Mortimer-Wang Counsel for the second respondent: G Dewar SUBJECT TO NON-PUBLICATION ORDER DECISION (COSTS) Dated 25 October 2022 2 INTRODUCTION [1] QQ (the appellant) was one of two owners of a residential property (the property) sold at auction, following an order of the High Court. The second respondent, NQ (the licens...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 203 Tinkler v Fugro PMS PTY Ltd & Pavement Management Services Ltd [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...[2012] NZEmpC 203 [6 December 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 203 ARC 98/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN BRYCE TINKLER Plaintiff AND FUGRO PMS PTY LTD & PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD Defendant ARC 30/12 AND IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs...

10. [2016] NZEmpC 16 Best Health Products Ltd v Nee [pdf, 172 KB]

    ...[2016] NZEmpC 16 [26 February 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 16 EMPC 254/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of costs in regard to an application for a stay of proceedings BETWEEN BEST HEALTH PRODUCTS LIMITED Plaintiff AND CHERIE NEE Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by memoranda dated 4, 22 December 2015, 12, 13 Januar...