2936 items matching your search terms
...matter arising. 10. In my respectful submission this is a reasonable, and appropriate, way forward in all the circumstances. DATED 6 September 2018 _____________________________ J D K Gardner-Hopkins Counsel for the Board 3 Environmental Defence Society Inc v The New Zealand King Salmon Co Ltd [2014 NZSC 38.
...purpose or scope of PC1. The s32 report states: The Waste Plan was made operative in 1997 and has not been amended or reviewed under section 79 of the RMA since that time. As a result, it has become out of date with current expectations regarding environmental management. The entirety of the Waste Plan will be reviewed alongside the Water Plan in preparation of a new LWRP. PC1 is an interim measure to address two pressing issues with the existing Waste Plan provisions in order t...
...production assumes growing dry matter (feed), which in turn assumes water availability. Farms cannot hope to meet production and financial targets if some of that water is taken away. I could understand the need for that if there was a pressing environmental issue addressed by reducing water use, or only unused “paper allocation” was being eliminated but undermining the financial stability of farms for no good reason seems destructive. 11. Removing allocation through PC7 i...
...90-91. 7 no adverse effects on aquatic life, mahika kai, and drinking water supplies as set out in Schedule 1B, there is simply no evidence as to whether or not such a standard can be certified, particularly in the absence of an assessment of environmental effects. 25 As Your Honour identified in the questions of Mr Brass for the Director- General of Conservation, it is difficult to see how some elements would be certified in the absence of an assessment of environmental effec...
...Barry had originally made his Judgement without the benefit of a simulation. 20. Oi and Mike believe the' proposal to be acceptable on balance, in terms of landscape and amenity effects. Stephen disagrees. Barry believes that from a wider environmental perspective the effects would be no more than minor. However, all the landscape architects agree that the amenity effects on some neighbouring properties are more than minor (with reference to the Magnitude of Effects rating scal...
...is entitled to costs that I fix in the sum of $1,000 together with the disbursement of the Court’s filing fees. GL Colgan Chief Judge Judgment signed at 9 am on Friday 24 November 2006 Solicitors: Employment and Environmental Law, PO Box 13609, Tauranga Jackson Reeves & Friis, DX HP 40052, Tauranga
...Appendices The following must be observed in relation to any measurements or assessments of port noise required by these Appendices: 1. Unless stated otherwise, port noise must be measured in accordance with NZS 6801:2008 Acoustics - Measurement of Environmental Sound and assessed in accordance with NZS 6809:1999 Acoustics- Port Noise Management and Land Use Planning, provided that: a. subject to Rule 9. 3. 6. 7. a, the rating level described in clause 7.3 of NZ:S6809:1999 Acoust...
...wellbeing of the Waikato and Waipā Rivers. However, Federated Farmers considers that the regulatory and non-regulatory methods proposed in PC1 do not appropriately give effect to the relevant higher order documents, have not appropriately balanced environmental, economic, social and cultural considerations, and are not the most efficient and effective means of achieving the objective of the plan change. 4. Federated Farmers is interested in all the issues raised by the Appell...
...process of the final America’s cup proposal or have effective input into the aspects of the proposal that may impact on cultural values, including site selection, base layout and design, and the final selection process; (g) The Assessment of Environmental Effects does not contain appropriate assessment of effects on cultural values/interests; (h) There has been insufficient cultural considerations and input into the legacy effects of the proposal; (i) There has been no conside...
...them to participate in the market economy. Today most Te Roroa people are unemployed and on benefits. It is even difficult for them to manage a subsistence economy because they are denied access to their traditional mahinga kai and much environmental damage has been done to the mahinga kai since they sold their land and lost control over its management. 20181026104653807.pdf 20181026104852049.pdf