Search Results

1. Puna v Puna - Rotopounamu 1B1A [2022] Chief Judges MB 28 (2022 CJ 28) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...in the listed beneficiaries. The first s 81A application was made on 31 May 1983, the administrators listed Ms Bartlett’s nine siblings as the beneficiaries entitled to receive her interests in the block though there is a cross through this information. The second s 81A application was made on 11 November 1983, the sole beneficiary listed by the administrators to receive the interests in the block is Paora Puna. [8] On 16 December 1983 at 5 RGTK MB 52, Ms Bartlett’s 132.013 shar...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 101 Pottinger & Nine Dot consulting Ltd v Carew and Kelly Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...necessary to protect those interests. It is submitted that there is a strongly arguable case that the third plaintiff aided and abetted, and encouraged by the first and second plaintiffs, has actively breached the covenants and misused confidential information belonging to the defendant in so doing. This, it is said, is relevant to a consideration of the overall justice of the case. The law [16] Contractual provisions restricting the activities of employees after terminati...

3. Issues with access to justice in the Environment Court of New Zealand [pdf, 477 KB]

   ...processing applica- tions and decisions. It was widely believed that the sheer breadth of open standing to participate in the early stages often resulted in inefficient and costly delays for propo- nents of development and other activities. Subsequent reforms of the RMA have made changes to that situation and could be argued to have sought to find a balance between public participation and efficiency of decision- making. Amendments in 1993 represented a step along that spectrum. Amendments in...

4. [2022] NZREADT 1 - DU v Real Estate Agents Authority & DC (1 February 2022) [pdf, 333 KB]

   ...licensee had said opposite things to different people on 20 December 2019, as to whether the purchasers had been advised of the slippage issue. [82] The appellant says he had been told by other agents that they are required to complete multi-offer forms when more than one offer comes in. [83] The appellant questions whether the vendor’s statement to the Authority (14 August 2020) was written by her and whether it is true. It is contradicted by the licensee’s email to her (t...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 109 Shelby Park Ltd v Blackie [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...without authority, a fact he admitted to Mr Skinner. This allegedly occurred in September and the two litres taken were worth between $200-$300, according to Mr Skinner’s evidence. [54] Mr Skinner gave no evidence that this was a matter that had formed the basis of any disciplinary action he took against Mr Blackie. It is not even recorded in the work diary. [55] Mr Blackie’s evidence was that he did not admit to stealing the two litres of Roundup. His evidence was that...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 188 Wakatipu Equities Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 414 KB]

   ...to the appeal by Waterfall Park Developments Limited (‘WPDL’), it supplements the findings to be made in the interim decision that will be issued shortly. For all other appeals in the List of Appellants, this decision will in due course inform our decisions or determinations on their relief. The issues for determination [4] As the parties have agreed, the issues for determination are as follows: (a) Is the WBRAZ (excepting the LP) to be treated as ‘general rural’ or ‘rur...

7. Watson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2024] NZACC 019 [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...trading surplus of $2,860.62. [17] On 18 January 2022, Erica Roets (Technical Accounting Specialist Adviser with the Corporation) provided a memorandum in relation to Mr Watson's weekly compensation entitlements. Her analysis of the financial information provided to the Corporation and IRD records and application of the relevant provisions of the Act was: (a) At the time of Mr Watson's accident and incapacity, he was an "earner" as defined in s 6. (b) The Corp...

8. CAC 20004 V Lindsay [2013] NZREADT 113 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...complainant, in relation to his possible tender on a property at 32-36 Rimu Street, Eastbourne (property), when, 2 from 7 May 2012, the defendant had a possible interest in the property; and/or (ii) participating in the tender having obtained information from the complainant, which would put the defendant at an advantage or perceived advantage. (b) Rule 6.3: The defendant’s conduct was likely to bring the profession into disrepute, in that the defendant submitted a tende...

9. Appendix-M3-O2NL-OIA-doc-1.pdf [pdf, 524 KB]

   O2NL OIA’s Official Correspondence <official.correspondence@nzta.govt.nz> To:shellybeannz@yahoo.co.nz Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 8:50 am Kia ora Shelly Please find attached the response to your request of 12 August 2022 for information under the Official Information Act 1982. Ngā mihi Ministerial Services Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency twitter | youtube | facebook From: Official Correspondence Sent: Thursday, 25

10. Directory of Official Information 2019 S-U [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance & Finance mailto:official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz mailto:off