LCRO 158/2018 YCH v TSR (30 September 2020) [pdf, 396 KB]
...beneficiaries). 2 [3] Ms TSR complaint about Mr YCH arose from her and Ms BSR’s disagreement with Mr QSR about how the estate assets should be distributed, and her concerns about the way Mr YCH acted on the estate administration, and performed his role as executor. [4] Mr ASR owned two adjoining properties which took centre stage to Ms TSR and Ms BSR’s disagreement with Mr QSR. First, [Property A] [no. A] comprising 1.3155ha being part of a disused quarry, surrounded by a...