[2018] NZEnvC 221 Giles v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.8 MB]
...the size of the lot to 4,873m2, leaving the balance lot 2 at 40ha (minima under the AUP). Nevertheless, it was acknowledged that the application was stilI for a non-complying activity. [9] After receiving the memoranda, and after reading the information supplied by David Wren, the Court was not satisfied that this met the criteria of the Act and that this was consistent with the objectives and policies of the Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP). 4 [10] Those provisions had been the subj...