Burnett v CAC 20003 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 17 [pdf, 70 KB]
...the normal way. [2] Mr and Mrs Burnett complained to Mr MacKenzie that they had not received double glazing, but rather had received secondary glazing. Mr MacKenzie gave evidence that from his enquiries that secondary glazing was a recognised form of double glazing and it had sound proofing and heat retention properties identical to or better than double glazing. He produced information from the internet showing that the Double Glazing company and Magicseal regard secondary gla...