Search Results

1. LG v HX [2024] NZT 681 (12 September 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...that it cannot lawfully be driven on the road. LG claims a refund of the price he paid, and compensation for the parts and labour he expended on the vehicle. [2] LG said that he bought the vehicle after seeing it advertised on [an online selling platform]. The purchase price was $15,500.00. At the time of the sale, HX gave him a copy of a LVVTA Rectification form, which set out the work that was needed in order for the vehicle to be certified as roadworthy. A number of items were listed...

2. N Ltd v P Ltd [2024] NZDT 751 (13 September 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...rebate of $3,300.00 for disruption to its business. P Ltd disputes the claim. 2. The relevant provision in the lease is ‘Partial Destruction’ which says at 27.1 3. If the premises or any portion of the building of which the premises may form part shall be damaged but not so as to render the premises untenantable ... the landlord shall with all reasonable speed expend all the insurance moneys received by the landlord in respect of such damage towards repairing such damage or rein...

3. 2025 April - Family Violence Provider Update [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...with our service offers and making improvements where possible. We plan to send contract variations in May for your consideration. Following that, we will host an online hui to discuss the contracts and answer any questions you may have. FVPP Forms reminders We have identified some confusion around certain forms, so here is some clarification to assist: • FVPP04 o If an FVPP04 is filed with DV Programmes and the referral left open, but the respondent fails to make further co...

4. Duty Lawyer Operational Policy for CPIP 2024 [pdf, 363 KB]

   Duty Lawyer Service Operational Policy Criminal Process Improvement Programme March 2024 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any p

5. Duty Lawyer Operational Policy for CPIP November 2024.pdf [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...Operational Policy Criminal Process Improvement Programme November 2024 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully e...

6. Duty Lawyer Operational Policy for CPIP December 2024.pdf [pdf, 375 KB]

   ...Operational Policy Criminal Process Improvement Programme December 2024 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully e...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 150 Kaiuma Farm Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...and of the discharges, including into the Coastal Marine Area (‘CMA’). [11] That evidence, which we emphasise has not yet been filed with the court, could raise the question of whether the discharge permit application ought to have had some form of notification. At this juncture there has been no kind of notification decision at all in relation to that application. [12] Marberry’s decision to make a fresh application ahead of this decision, 4 which will now have to be t...

8. Legal Aid Practice note - November 2022 [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...irrelevant matter; or if it depends upon findings which are unsupported by the evidence”.2 8. A finding that a decision is ‘manifestly unreasonable’ requires “not only that the decision be found to be unreasonable, but that [the Tribunal] forms the view that the decision is so clearly unreasonable that the intervention of the [Tribunal] is called for”.3 9. The threshold for intervention by the Tribunal is a high one.4 10. The Tribunal may confirm, modify, or reverse the...

9. Review Subcommittees v PG 22/2016 (30 November 2016) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...law firm did not have to arrange for the owners’ signatures to be witnessed or obtain consent from any mortgagees. It simply had to check the documents and file them electronically with LINZ. (d) The disbursement of $16.87 for printing and forms was not warranted because in most cases the forms were emailed to the owners who then printed them out. (e) Fee estimates for the same work obtained from two other law firms were $350 plus GST and disbursements, totalling $502.50, in...

10. LAT - Practice note - 2022 [pdf, 270 KB]

    ...irrelevant matter; or if it depends upon findings which are unsupported by the evidence”.2 8. A finding that a decision is ‘manifestly unreasonable’ requires “not only that the decision be found to be unreasonable, but that [the Tribunal] forms the view that the decision is so clearly unreasonable that the intervention of the [Tribunal] is called for”.3 9. The threshold for intervention by the Tribunal is a high one.4 10. The Tribunal may confirm, modify, or reverse the...