Search Results

Search results for forms.

14986 items matching your search terms

  1. Willis Bond & Co [pdf, 265 KB]

    Form 33 Notice of person's wish to be party to proceedings To the Registrar Enviromnent Court Seclion 274. Resource Management Act 1991 Auckland, Wellington, and Christchurch Willis Bond & Co, as manager for the development entity Wynyard Central Development Limited Partnership, wishes to be a party to the following proceedings: Panuku Development Auckland Limited v Auckalnd Council (ENV -20l8-AKL-78). Willis Bond & Co made a submission about the subject matter ofthe...

  2. G v EQC [2021] CEIT-2020-0010 [pdf, 115 KB]

    ...however, the terms of the proposed settlement agreement are not acceptable to G and are not open to change by EQC. [3] This issue is genuinely in dispute. The parties have asked that I record the fact of the settlement, although not the sum, in the form of a decision finalising the application. [4] I make the following orders: (a) EQC will pay G the Settlement figure recorded in my minute of today’s date, within 7 days; and (b) This application is concluded. C D Bo...

  3. KQ v LI [2023] NZDT 593 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

    ...hearing LI’s phone number was [redacted]. The Referee noted that LI initially answered then hung up, then did not answer 2 further calls. Then later that day he called the court and provided his wife’s number to be used, not the number in the claim form. Referee: J Savage Date: 6 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made...

  4. [2014] NZEmpC 204 MAS Zengrange (NZ) Ltd v HDT Ltd Anor [pdf, 12 KB]

    ...[1] The applicant has discontinued this proceeding and the following orders are sought by consent: a) Ms Hansen is discharged from acting as Court appointed independent solicitor. b) Mr Budge of KPMG shall delete all material, in whatever form, obtained in the forensic search; and thereafter. c) Mr Budge is discharged from acting as independent computer forensic expert in relation to this litigation. d) There is no issue as to costs and costs will lie where they fal...

  5. LO v SD [2021] NZDT 1388 (3 July 2019) [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...person/entity outside New Zealand so that person is not subject to New Zealand laws. Is there any other cause of action against Ms D? 9. I find that there is no other cause of action for a legal claim against Ms D. There was no contract formed for Ms D’s help as there was no consideration provided or any intention to create legal relations – Ms D was simply asked to help obtain tickets as a favour to her friend – Ms D emphasises that she was approached by Ms O, not the oth...

  6. NT v DNR Ltd [2023] NZDT 392 (10 August 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...necessarily signal ‘bad faith’ as DN for the respondent has suggested. I note that NT did not claim against any of the law firm’s staff personally, rather he had named three different people as ‘Organisation’s contact’ people on the claim form. 5. DN has pointed out that he sent a letter to both the Tribunal and NT after the claim was lodged stating that the claim was misconstrued. I imagine that was probably of little assistance to NT because it was not specific enough t...

  7. BD v U Ltd [2022] NZDT 232 (10 November 2022) [pdf, 179 KB]

    ...requirement that the vehicle must “securely locked when unattended”. 8. Both parties participated in the telephone hearing on 31 October. NS represented U Ltd. 9. It is not disputed that the “securely locked when unattended” requirement forms part of the policy that BD holds with U Ltd. The policy states “if you do not comply with your responsibilities under this section, we can decline any claim (and recover any claims payment already made)”. 10. It is not disputed...

  8. KI v MA [2023] NZDT 385 (23 August 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...this was to be paid on the moving date. However, as the applicant did not pay the bond, no consideration for the contract was paid before the respondent withdrew the offer. c. The parties had not reached a state where both parties had intended to form legal relations on clear and certain terms. If so, did either party breach the contract? 8. As I do not find that there was a contract between the parties, there is no need for me to consider this issue. What payments, if any,...

  9. HT v SE [2020] NZDT 1397 (15 May 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...paid, being $2800.00, and also any loss that was reasonably foreseeable as liable to result from the failure of guarantee. The repair cost for the starter issue falls into that category (although also arose from the contract, because HT said they formed an agreement before the sale that he would be reimbursed for the starter repair) so SE is also liable to pay $220.00 for the starter repair. 10. HT’s claim is therefore awarded in full. Referee: Johanna Perfect Date:...