Search Results

1. LA - Part 2 - Areas of Law Waitangi Tribunal [pdf, 777 KB]

   ...for each area or category. Case examples should be cases where you played a substantial and active role. Examples need to demonstrate substantial and active involvement across the range of cases. Please complete the Waitangi Tribunal Case Examples Form. You must provide the following case examples: • Provide at least three examples of substantial Waitangi Tribunal proceedings. • Each example must demonstrate that you had a substantial and active involvement in the case. • all...

2. BC v SL & XB Ltd [2023] NZDT 568 (14 November 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...replacement of the thermostat (and any other required work to address the overheating) was not a result of their work on the vehicle. The claim is therefore dismissed. Referee Perfect Date: 14 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

3. PI v NQJ [2023] NZDT 630 (27 November 2023) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...been unjustly enriched by PI’s work. 23. The Disputes Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear PI’s claim, and the claim must be struck out. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 27 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

4. SN v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 645 (25 October 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...contract and be compensated for the estimated costs for the repairs by another supplier of $2,139.00. She is not liable for the outstanding amount to G Ltd. Referee: P Goddard Date: 25 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. NT v T Ltd & L Ltd [2023] NZDT 724 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...that one of the possible consequences of not paying for parking was the towing of his vehicle. 9. I accept NT intended to pay but was having difficulty downloading or accessing the app. However, as L Ltd said, it is unable to ascertain that information without some communication from the owner. It said if NT had rung the 0800 number to tell them he was having difficulty, his car could have been placed on the “no-tow” list. NT accepted he had seen the 24 hour phone number to call...

6. MD Ltd v UB [2017] NZDT 1483 (12 February 2018) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...required under CCCFA s 17? b) Did MD comply with the lender responsibility principles? c) What sum, if any, is payable? Has MD made the disclosure required under CCCFA s 17? 4. CCCFA s 17 requires a creditor to ensure that the applicable key information set out in CCCFA Schedule 1 is disclosed to the debtor before a consumer credit contract is entered into. CCCFA s 99 prohibits the creditor from enforcing a consumer credit contract before the required disclosure has been made. 5....

7. Kemp v Matenga - Ngatarawa and Ohiti Waitio Land Trust (2016) 55 Takitimu MB 142 (55 TKT 142) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...The trust then contacted Rana McClutchie requesting a refund but was advised that the money had been paid to the applicant’s tertiary provider. Subsequently, the trust secretary contacted the Kohanga reo listed on the trust’s application form and at that point was advised that the grant had nothing to do with the Kohanga reo. Rana McClutchie it is said is a daughter of Sandra Matenga. The short point is that, following an exchange of emails, it emerged that Rana McClutchie w...

8. HA v Z Ltd [2023] NZDT 288 (17 July 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...installed in the property. 8. His claim seeks reimbursement of $1,150.00. 9. The hearing took place by phone on 20 June 2023. Both parties participated in the hearing. AI represented Z Ltd. The issue 10. The report was prepared by “KV” a former sub-contractor to Z Ltd. 11. AI, the owner of Z Ltd, submitted that: a. Z Ltd has no record of this job. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 b. Z Ltd did not receive payment from HA, and the bank account stated...

9. FX v KQ [2023] NZDT 538 (29 September 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...FX has not been able to prove her claim that KQ gave injectable treatments at the staff discount rate without her authority, FX’s claim must be dismissed. Referee: JF Tunnicliffe Date: 29 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. DE v FX [2017] NZDT 1381 (7 February 2017) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...the sculptures were worth $3,500 each. On the other hand, FX obtained an estimate of $500 to $1,000 from JBD or $1,400 to $1,800 from BP. 15. Despite hearing evidence from the parties regarding the experience of the different valuers and the information or assumptions on which their valuations were based, it remains unclear which valuation is most accurate. Given the large element of uncertainty in valuing an art work, I have simply taken a rough average of the estimates obtained by eac...