Search Results

1. UW v X Ltd [2022] NZDT 290 (12 December 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...downplay UW’s ability. UW contacted DQ from OQ Ltd when he didn’t get the PG2 licence from X Ltd. DQ viewed footage of UW paragliding and stated that UW could not control forward and reverse inflations sufficiently for a PG2 licence. UW was informed of this. DQ records that UW responded that he would practice. 6. The second instructor that considered UW to be too unsafe to issue a PG2 licence to at the time was OI, [redacted]. She along with three other instructors at Q L...

2. MX v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 251 (28 April 2023) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...as there is no evidence the failure was substantial in any way, I find the claim must be dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: K. Edwards Date: 28 April 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. E Ltd v FN [2023] NZDT 783 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...arrangements he made with E Ltd. 15. E Ltd is therefore entitled to payment of full amount of the invoice of $1,167.00. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: S Simmonds Date: 18 December 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to appl...

4. BS v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 70 (27 February 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...adjournment order dated 13 November 2023 sets out the background to the claim. 2. BS submitted that: a. After the first hearing, she looked to file an ACC claim online. She watched a tutorial video which advised the claimant to have “detailed information about the accident ready before filing”. b. She considered that what happened to her was negligence, not an ‘accident’. She telephoned ACC to clarify whether she could still file a claim. c. The person that she spoke...

5. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 DM expert Dennis Scott [pdf, 364 KB]

   ...Landscape Planning, Assessment, Design and Management at levels 6, 7 and 8. 7. I am experienced in a wide range of landscape planning, analysis, assessment and management programmes and the relationship of interpretive design input into the formal New Zealand statutory and land use planning process, including the preparation of plans under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). I have been involved 2 in the formulation of several regional and district planning documents...

6. NL & TG v JN [2024] NZDT 44 (12 January 2024) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...APPLICANT NL APPLICANT TG RESPONDENT JN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NL and TG live next door to a property that is co-owned by JN. 2. Their claim relates to problems with the behaviour of former occupants of that property, in particular that they threw rubbish over the fence onto NL and TG’s lawn. 3. The claim seeks compensation of $300.00 for the removal of the rubbish. 4. The hearing took place by phone on 11 Januar...

7. HE v QZ [2023] NZDT 372 (18 January 2023) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 a. The job progressed satisfactorily in 2018. The slab and foundation were signed off by the local council. The framing was also signed off after some remedial work. b. In or around December 2018, HE’s architect, Mr N, informed him that there would be changes to the plan. c. When he returned to the site in January 2019 he found that an internal wall had been built in the garage by unknown persons. d. He carried out only minor work in...

8. DO v TC [2022] NZDT 264 (23 December 2022) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...DO could have sold the wreck for, had it not been stolen) — as TC is insured by YZ Ltd, it is her insurance company that will actually be making that payment. Referee Perfect Date: 23 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

9. LS v BI [2023] NZDT 382 (13 September 2023) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...of 21 April (‘machine and fit 1 x spark plug helicoil, run up engine and clear ECU of faults’) $273.66. This is a total of $388.66. Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 13 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. LA v KZ [2023] NZDT 574 (14 November 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...refundable to LA? 12. For the reasons given above, I find that KZ is liable to pay $900.00 to LA and the balance of the claim and the counter-claim are dismissed. Referee Perfect Date: 14 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...