Search Results

1. EI v CT [2021] NZDT 1703 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...timely services. 4. The issues I must decide are: a. Was the work done as contracted? b. If so, is EI entitled to $603.75 as claimed, or any other sum? Was the work done as contracted? 5. Under contract law, a legally binding contract is formed when both parties intend to contract on agreed terms and intend for those terms to be legally binding. The terms of a contract are formed at the beginning, not at the end, and what was agreed is looked at objectively, i.e., by looking at...

2. BC v GN [2021] NZDT 1674 (28 November 2021) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...BC. 4. The issues I must decide are: a. What terms were agreed? b. Was the contract frustrated? c. Is BC entitled to $581.00 as claimed, or to any other sum? What terms were agreed? 5. Under contract law, a legally binding contract is formed when both parties intend to contract on agreed terms and intend for those terms to be legally binding. The terms of a contract are formed at the beginning, not at the end, and what was agreed is looked at objectively, i.e., by looking...

3. MS v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 763 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Tribunal awards the $5,000.00 MS seeks but deducts the outstanding amounts due under the contract, leaving a balance payable to MS of $2,400.00. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 18 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

4. NC v GT Limited [2024] NZDT 39 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...that was misleading or deceptive, or bait advertising, I do not need to consider this question. 12. For the above reasons the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 26 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. [2020] NZIACDT 54 - DY v Parker (21 December 2020) [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...instructions. [2] The complainant made a complaint to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority). It has been referred by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) to the Tribunal. It is alleged that Mr Parker permitted Mr Zhao to perform work exclusively reserved under the law to a licensed adviser, thereby being negligent, a ground of complaint under the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act). Alternatively, it is alleged that Mr Parker has breach...

6. NL v KS Ltd [2020] NZDT 1477 (21 August 2020) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...to remove the $76.82 from the claim. 13. I find the cost relating to the balance of the claim reasonable. 14. Accordingly, KS Ltd must pay B Ltd $3,311.40. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 21 August 2020 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to appl...

7. TO v ZY & M Ltd [2023] NZDT 276 (1 August 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...activity caused him any loss and homeowners can expect to maintain their driveway without pay. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 1 August 2023 1 Nuisance is a tort. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. KM and MM v IO Ltd and LC Ltd [2020] NZDT 1408 (15 May 2020) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...June 2020; and The claim against IO Ltd is dismissed. The issuing of this order has been delayed as a result of the COVID 19 lockdown. Reasons 1. On 19 August 2019, LC Ltd (‘LC’) entered KM and MM’s property at [Property A], and performed extensive tree pruning (‘pollarding’) on a large [Redacted] tree in their front yard. 2. IO Ltd had engaged LC to work on a tree at the front of [Property B], but LC mistakenly entered the neighbouring property belonging to KM and MM...

9. QU v LG [2023] NZDT 775 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...lame’. QU believes this is evidence that [The horse] was not suitable for show jumping on 6 January 2022. LG’s view is that mechanical lameness does not prevent a horse from show jumping, rather that is a description of a gait that does not conform to the usual but is not associated with any pain. I prefer LG’s view for the following reasons: a. It is supported by the description of mechanical lameness in the online MSD Veterinary Manual. b. It is consistent with the [Veter...

10. ED v UQ [2023] NZDT 305 (19 June 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...in had the representation regarding the horse’s condition been true, she is entitled to claim $2,060.47 in damages. Accordingly, this amount is awarded. Referee: DTR Fuli Date: 19 June 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...