SC v OX [2023] NZDT 548 (21 September 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]
...in that arrangement retrospectively, after SC had given notice and after a dispute had arisen about how bills were to be shared. I therefore find that SC is not liable to pay the $810 rental claimed for six weeks half-share of the empty room that forms part of OX’s counter-claim calculations. What bill payments is SC liable to pay? 9. I find OX’s other bill payment amounts claimed under the counter-claim to be reasonable and supported by evidence, with the exception of the late...