Search Results

1. L Ltd v NO [2024] NZDT 113 (23 January 2024) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...costs claimed are reasonable. They are proved with appropriate documents and invoices and are consistent with the extensive damage to LC’s vehicle. Referee: J P Smith Date: 23 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. CL v ND [2023] NZDT 12 (8 February 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...if he wished to vacate the property, to give 14 days’ notice to CL. ND claims that CL left without giving the required period of notice, and claims for unpaid rent. [2] CL said that ND brought a trailer to the property on 28 November 2022 and informed CL that he, ND, was intending to leave, which he did on that day. As no prior notice had been given, CL considered that ND should have paid rent up to 12 December. ND’s last rental payment had been made on 4 November. Allowing for the b...

3. ZE v NE [2022] NZDT 90 (26 August 2022) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...Page 2 of 3 8. For these reasons I find that NE was not negligent and is not responsible for the cat’s distressing injuries nor the costs to treat them. Referee Perfect Date: 26 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. BN & UN v ON [2023] NZDT 250 (21 June 2023) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...teleconference, however as ON did not answer calls made to the number provided for him, the hearing proceeded in his absence. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: K. Edwards Date: 21 June 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to a...

5. KD v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 617 (3 November 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...the CGA 1993 meant that this product ought to have lasted for more than five years. I was unable to find a reference to this in the CGA website that KD had referred to. 8. I consider the submission was likely to be an extrapolation from the information provided to the Tribunal by KD from the [cloud storage website] website and from KD’s own experience with hard drives during his 25 years in the IT industry. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 9. KD described himself as an IT

6. LG v DG [2023] NZDT 361 (31 July 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...satisfaction of the debt owed by DG. Conclusion 20. DG was obliged to pay LG $5,700 for the car. He has only paid $500 and so owes LG the balance of $5,200.00 Referee: S Simmonds Date: 31 July 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. BS v TT [2019] NZDT 1485 (5 December 2019) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...situation, the person who was ultimately liable must reimburse the person who was compelled to pay. 6. BS said that [Telecommunications provider] has been compelling her to make payments on her account for the phone, although she did not bring information to the hearing that would enable me to determine how much has been paid to date and how much is still owing. However, TT has received the benefit of the phone itself together with the insurance, and I find that it would be unconscionabl...

8. Council v HL [2020] NZDT1493 (27 February 2020) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...requires all drivers to take all reasonable care to ensure that their actions or omissions do not cause harm to those persons they can reasonably foresee could be harmed by their actions or omissions. 5. The standard of care that drivers must conform to is that of the reasonable and prudent driver. This is an objective standard that does not take into account the weaknesses or idiosyncrasies of the person whose conduct is in question. 6. It is clear that HL did not meet this obj...

9. B Ltd v IC [2018] NZDT 1540 (20 August 2018) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...made the finding in the preceding paragraph, it follows that I also find that IC is not liable to pay the amount claimed. I therefore dismiss the claim. Referee: Peter Ferguson Date: 20 August 2018 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply...

10. EC v OM Ltd [2022] NZDT 89 (22 August 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...of substantial character, was not rejected within a reasonable time and can be repaired, the claim must be dismissed. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Monday, 22 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...