Search Results

1. HN v CN [2024] NZDT 20 (22 January 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...was heard today at 11.30 am by teleconference however as CN did not answer calls made to the number provided for her, the hearing proceeded in her absence. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 22 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. KG v OAU [2022] NZDT 225 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...had pulled over to change its tyre. KG said the pothole caused extensive damage to not only his tyre, but also to the rim of the wheel. 2. KG telephoned the police at 1.00pm and E, the contractors who are engaged by OAU to repair the roads, performed a temporary repair by 2.15pm that day. 3. KG claimed to be compensated for the loss that his insurer has not covered, being half of the cost of a new tyre and his excess. 4. The issues to resolve the claim are: (a) Did OAU ow...

3. FI & IS v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 252 (7 June 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...actual cost incurred as a result of their choice to pay by credit card. 11. For these reasons I find that M Ltd is liable to pay FI and IS $513.00. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 7 June 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. OO v Q Ltd and T Ltd [2023] NZDT 231 (6 May 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...beyond repair, and OO is entitled a refund. Conclusion 8. For these reasons Q is to pay OO the sum of $1,985.61 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 6 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

5. UJ v TV [2023] NZDT 429 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...find that it is not proven that there is a misrepresentation. 5. For these reasons the remaining issues need not be determined, and the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Rendall Date: 31 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

6. BI v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 497 (20 September 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...occurrence from happening. 10. As I have found that H Ltd did not owe a duty of care to hazard mark the trailer drawbar, the claim is dismissed. Referee: Ms Cowie DTR Date: 20 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

7. NC v NO [2023] NZDT 544 (20 September 2023) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...September 2023 at 9.15am. The respondent NO had been notified of the hearing but failed to attend, although his phone number seemed to be connected. On 16 June 2023, NO had emailed the tribunal. He acknowledged the existence of this proceeding and informed the tribunal that he was living overseas. As his phone number may have been different, he was requested to provide his overseas phone number, to facilitate a telephone hearing, but he failed to do that. Background On 4 January 2...

8. BW v EO [2023] NZDT 20 (2 March 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...was in good condition before the damage occurred. 8. In conclusion, I find that EO must pay BW $1,139.30 as compensation for the damage he caused. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 2 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

9. SB v UC Ltd [2023] NZDT 454 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...date of the order. I consider that interest should be paid from 9 June 2022, which comes to $818.63. The total sum payable is therefore $18,797.27. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 31 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. KT v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 632 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...the cost of the parts that KT purchased, for the failure to provide the full lockset. KT is to return the lockset to D Ltd on receipt of the refund. Referee: Arti Chand Date: 23 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...