Search Results

1. KD & LD v XN Ltd [2024] NZDT 215 (5 March 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...with the purchase. It follows that they are entitled to a return of the deposit that they paid. [9] Thus, XN Ltd must pay the applicants $1,000.00. Referee: C Hawes Date: 5 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. TE v EX [2022] NZDT 122 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...The Tribunal has no power to hear or determine claims for personal injury or exemplary damages. 9. Accordingly, both claims are dismissed. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 1 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. SU v WC [2022] NZDT 215 (21 November 2022) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...that I should award SU. 18. For these reasons the claim by SU against WC is proved. 19. For these reasons WC is to pay SU $2,755.32. Referee: K Johnson Date: 21 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

4. OX v B Ltd [2023] NZHC 292 (28 July 2023) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...the right earbud if OX paid half the cost, however I find that given there was a major failure with the product, that OX is entitled to a refund of the purchase price. Referee: Kaho Date: 28 July 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. WD v HT [2023] NZDT 674 (1 November 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...to be made by HT to put the caravan into the condition he stated it was, without betterment, is 70% of the repair quote, being $4,935.00. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 1 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. ED & KD v NQ [2023] NZDT 701 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...the land along or on either side of a boundary between adjoining occupiers for any such purpose. It does not include the time of the person requiring the fence to research options and prepare notices. 9. A notice should also include sufficient information to enable the person receiving the notice to estimate the costs involved. 10. After reviewing the notice, I find the information to be inadequate to enable NQ to gain a proper estimate of the true costs that he could be liable for...

7. DF v FX [2023] NZDT 673 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...any contributory negligence by DF, FX is solely liable for the damage caused to DF’ vehicle and is liable to J Ltd for the repair costs. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 31 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. HC v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 214 (14 November 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...find that for the price paid, and regular and type of use expected, that a reasonable consumer would not expect such a watch to retain all its characteristics and functionality over a 3 year mark. In saying this I had some regard to its continued performance for over a year past the manufacturer’s 2 year warranty (acknowledging this is not the limit under the CGA) and that at least some deterioration could reasonably be expected over this period of time, not limited to wear and tear, e...

9. MD & IL v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 201 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...the hassle-factor, I consider that is already included in the setting of a percentage amount for damages, so the final amount F Ltd is liable to pay is $1700.00. Referee Perfect Date: 2 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. D Ltd v AB [2023] NZDT 473 (15 September 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...the Tribunal’s $30,000.00 limit. 11. I therefore conclude that AB is liable to pay $30,000.00 in compensation for the damage to the [vehicle 1]. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 15 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...