Search Results

1. ENV-2016-AKL-000211 Okura Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...precinct (527 Okura Precinct) for approximately 130ha of land north of Vaughans Road, Okura owned by OHL, along with rezoning of that land from Countryside Living to Mixed Housing Suburban, Large Lot, Open Space Conservation and Open Space Informal Recreation zones, as outlined in the IHP's recommendation. (c) The Council's decision to reject the IHP's recommendation under Topic 081c "Rezoning and Precincts (North)" to rezone from Countryside Living to F

2. MS v UM [2024] NZDT 42 (14 February 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...I therefore make the order accordingly that UM pay the cost of the drainlayer and half the amount claimed for lost income, being a total of $493.22. Referee: DTR. Edwards Date: 14 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. Almirante & Others v Sparks [2018] NZIACDT 10 (3 April 2018) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...then current INZ fees in the written agreement, and did not. Mr Sparks admits engaging in dishonest or misleading behaviour in breach of [section 44(2)(d)] of the 2007 Act, on the basis that he should not have checked the work visa application form box that he did, saying that immigration advice had not been provided to any of the above clients/complainants when in fact he had provided such advice. Denials Mr Sparks denies breaching s 44(2)(a) of the 2007 Act, on the basis that th...

4. TE & TT v ST [2023] NZDT 54 (26 January 2023).pdf [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the claim by the applicants against the respondents and the claim is struck out. Referee: K Johnson Date: 26 January 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

5. LI v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 525 (10 October 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...T Ltd has not breached any legal duty that it owed to LI, and it is not liable for the costs that LI has incurred. 20. The claim must be dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 10 October 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. KS & QS v ZA [2023] NZDT 421 (25 August 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...surveyor mark out the boundaries of the properties so that any new fence would be built on the boundary line. 3. KS and QS engaged a friend of theirs who was a surveyor to survey the boundary ‘off the record’. However, as this was the case, no formal report was produced and when ZA asked for one, KS and QS were unable to provide it. Being unsure that the pegs located by KS and QS friend were indeed the correct boundary markers, ZA did not agree to the building of the new fence.

7. E Ltd v IU [2023] NZDT 516 (3 October 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...Van rather than slowing, and this failure to follow the road rules cause the accident. 10. Therefore, I order that IU is liable for the damage to the Van. Referee: CD Boys Date: 3 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. D K Rentals v TL [2022] NZDT 161 (30 September 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...18. I find that the reasonable value of D&K’s caravan is $13,500. That is the amount TL is to pay, minus the credit of $82.86 from the Bond. Referee: J.F. Tunnicliffe Date: 30 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

9. DD v B Ltd [2022] NZDT 258 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...charged) and a visit carried out in 2022 will need to be the subject of a separate claim as they had not been lodged via a counter-claim for today’s hearing. Referee Perfect Date: 20 December 2022 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. LL & NL v KI [2023] NZDT 745 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...replace the whole liner and the jib behind it. 10. In conclusion, the claim for $1,200.00 is proved. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 12 December 2023 1 Section 32 & 36 Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...