Search Results

1. D K Rentals v TL [2022] NZDT 161 (30 September 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...18. I find that the reasonable value of D&K’s caravan is $13,500. That is the amount TL is to pay, minus the credit of $82.86 from the Bond. Referee: J.F. Tunnicliffe Date: 30 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. DD v B Ltd [2022] NZDT 258 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...charged) and a visit carried out in 2022 will need to be the subject of a separate claim as they had not been lodged via a counter-claim for today’s hearing. Referee Perfect Date: 20 December 2022 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

3. LL & NL v KI [2023] NZDT 745 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...replace the whole liner and the jib behind it. 10. In conclusion, the claim for $1,200.00 is proved. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 12 December 2023 1 Section 32 & 36 Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. EL v BN [2022] NZDT 156 (23 September 2022) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...payment (with the law firm that holds the house settlement money currently), I reflect that agreement by ordering that BN is to pay $1040.00 directly to EL. Referee Perfect Date: 23 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

5. EN v IX Ltd [2022] NZDT 223 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...of the doors. EN’s claim is therefore dismissed and IX Ltd are entitled to the balance due for the manufacture and supply of the doors and windows. Referee: R Merrett Date: 30 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. OE v PN [2024] NZDT 179 (22 March 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...has not been met and therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Nigel Wolland Date: 22 March 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. EN v ML [2022] NZDT 257 (19 December 2022) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...for EN to prove his claim it must be shown that his version is more likely than ML’s. Because he has not the claim cannot succeed and must be dismissed. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 19 December 2022 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

8. BM v NE [2023] NZDT 612 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...$949.36 One house swab to confirm whether the house was contaminated $138.00 Total $21,494.93 20. NE is to pay BM $21,494.93 Referee: Verdun Tawhara Date: 6 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

9. NG & UG v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 502 (30 August 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...because that was the basis on which the proposed management fee was reduced from 6% to 5%. 6. Although B Ltd implemented the 5% fee in the expectation that the new contract would be signed, I consider that this was a situation in which a degree of formality was expected, and the new contract would not become binding until it was signed by both parties. Meanwhile, the CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 original contract, which rolled over at the expiry of the 12-month term, remained i...

10. A Ltd v NT & TH [2023] NZDT 764 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 155 KB]

    ...produced that this invoice dated 1/4/21 in the amount of $10,627.94 is for justified extras to the contract price and have not been already paid for by the respondents and then charged again in this claim. 9. The respondents rely on an earlier “Proforma Invoice” dated 3/2/20 for $22,500.00 and an email in relation to their allegation they have been charged twice for this work. They also directed me to a portion of the applicant’s bank statement that shows the earlier invoice was...