IN v SU [2021] NZDT 1652 (12 July 2021) [pdf, 161 KB]
...warrant of fitness the next morning and if the car did not pass, either lower the price or repair it and deliver it to IN the following week held no meaning either. 24. I disagree. As set out in para (15) – (17) I find that those were terms that formed part of the contract. IN agreed to those terms, he relied on SU’s promises. 25. The evidence shows the parties intended to form a contract and intended the contract to be binding. This element of the contract is met. Did the...