Search Results

1. [2020] NZREADT 31 – Turoa v Real Estate Agents Authority (30 July 2020) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...He said that if they wanted to make an offer they would have to move fast and put it in that night, that is the night of Saturday, 17 February. This phone call took place at approximately 9.00 pm. Mr Turoa in that, or another, call gave them information including the price at which the property had been passed in at auction and advice as to the approximate level of any offer they would have to go if they would have a chance. The upshot was that the complainants decided they could go t...

2. LCRO 73/2024 OR v SV (3 September 2024) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...complete this. [24] On 9 July 2020, the respondent wrote to Mr AE again by email: 4 Following on from the meeting we had, we prepared documentation for you with regard to Suburb 2. This has not yet been signed and the Wills are still in draft form. We understood this was all urgent to take place, however we have had no further instructions from you. We enclose our invoice for work to date and look forward to hearing from you as to whether or not you wish to progress the new stru...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 007 Ravenswood Developments Limited v Waimakariri Distrrict Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...279(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court, by consent, orders that: the appeal is allowed to the extent that Plan Change 30 to the Waimakariri District Plan is accepted in accordance with Appendix 1, attached to and forming part of this order; 2 the appeal is otherwise dismissed. B: Under s 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] This proceeding concerns an appeal by Ravenswood Developm...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 143 Cooper v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 857 KB]

   ...from those which were in the Commissioner’s decision, there will need to be a final check of those in light of this decision. H: We therefore direct the Applicant and Council to confer and to file and serve a memorandum attaching the final form of subdivision conditions in accordance with this substantive decision by 5pm, 5 July 2024. I: If anything arises from what is filed and served by the Applicant and the Council, TATL and MDL may raise that with the Court within seven...

5. Damages awarded

   ...Date Case Notes Award 18 March 2025 Cheng v Serco New Zealand Limited [2025] NZHRRT 11 PA Declaration under s 102(2)(a) of the Privacy Act 2020 that there was an interference with privacy in respect of response to requests to access personal information.   5 March 2025 Cummings v KAM Transport Limited [2025] NZHRRT 8  PA Declaration under s 85(1)(a) of the Privacy Act 1993 that there was an interference with privacy by disclosure of personal information without authorisati

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights

6. Standard explanation of effects and implications of anEPA in relation to property [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...together (jointly) or can act separately (severally). You can also appoint successor attorneys, cancel (revoke) previous EPAs, determine the extent of your attorney’s authority to act, and say who they must consult. See sections B to M of the EPA form for these options. Your attorney can make decisions only on the property matters you specify in the EPA. Your attorney has to follow any conditions and restrictions in your EPA and in the Act. Unlike an ordinary power of attorne...

7. Hill - Mangatainoka 1BC NO2B NO3 [2018] Chief Judge's MB 250 (2018 CJ 250) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...discussed with His Honour Judge Doogan. 5. The applicant also filed leave to appeal out of time in terms of s.58(3) of the Act. This application does not specify any reasons for the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal, but does refer to fresh information has come to hand that support an appeal. 6. In relation to the application for leave to appeal out of time no fee has been filed, however the applicant also filed a request for the filing fees to be waived on the 2018 Chief J...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 144 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...amended statement of claim filed on 24 June 2015 pleaded three variations of an unlawful lockout cause of action. First, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant’s refusal to engage union members for employment, other than on the defendant’s form of individual employment agreement, constituted an unlawful lockout. The second cause of action was an alternatively particularised allegation of unlawful lockout. The third cause of action was a second alternative particularisation...

9. ENV-2016-AKL-000189 Cabra Rural Developments Limited & Others v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...sustainable management of resources . (b) The provisions in paragraph 7 above have been added, deleted or amended outside of the scope of submissions, contrary to section 148 (1) LGATPA. (c) The Council's decision is based on incomplete information. In particular the decision-makers did not consider or have access to: i. Interim Guidance provided by the Independent Hearings Panel for RPS Topic 013; ii. Updated Interim Guidance text for RPS Topic 011 - Rural Subdivision; iii. T...

10. BI v YP & Ors LCRO 115 / 2010 (4 April 2011) [pdf, 97 KB]

    ...question why the Committee had not adjusted the lawyers’ fee. [12] I do not agree with the Applicant’s interpretation of the Committee’s decision. The Standards Committee made no adverse finding against the Practitioners, having 4 formed the view that the Practitioners’ conduct did not reach the threshold that would constitute unsatisfactory conduct. Therefore there was no justification for a fees adjustment for that reason. For the sake of clarification, I will a...