Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 174 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...against Singapore Airlines is no longer to be pursued. No such application has been filed against Zambion. The non-parties in question, PSG and Zambion, are alleged to have been, at various stages, the payroll service providers to Mr Matsuoka’s former employer the defendant LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (LSG). [4] Returning to r 7.55 of the High Court Rules. Plaintiff counsel, Mr O’Brien, in his submissions this morning, has included submissions relating to the issue of w...

2. BB v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 10 (5 April 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312826#DLM312826 https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312818#DLM312818 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to app...

3. TN v HD [2023] NZDT 468 (16 August 2023) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...Cadastral Survey Act 2002. The Disputes Tribunal has no jurisdiction under that Act. Outcome 23. The claim and counter-claim are dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 16 August 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. DT v SC [2023] NZDT 23 (25 January 2023) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...Ltd’s bank account while it was a registered company, and after it was removed from the register; b. I accept HI’s evidence that she contacted and spoke with SC, on behalf of the School, in early June 2022 and forwarded relevant information about the overpayment. Since that time, despite numerous emails, texts, and calls, HI and DT have not been able to make contact with SC, nor have they received a response; CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 c. the T...

5. BN v NI [2022] NZDT 130 (22 August 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...done to determine whether there was a leak anywhere else in the heat pump. The assessments and tests showed no leak. Subsequent to this, BN took possession of the property. 9. BN’s evidence that there was a leak relied upon the inspection performed by C of CB Company. C gave evidence at the hearing too. Her evidence was that by this time there definitely was a leak in the heat pump and there was no cost-effective option other than replacing it. There were leak and water marks on the...

6. KC & JBH Ltd v MK [2022] NZDT 79 (24 January 2022) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...MK is to pay to JBH the sum of $3,020.85 on or before 15 February 2022. 32. JBH is to pay to KC the sum of $500.00 on or before 15 February 2022. Referee: P Byrne Date: 24 January 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. B Ltd v OQ [2024] NZDT 107 (11 January 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...[11] Thus, although I accept that B Ltd did the work for which it claims, I consider it is not entitled to payment from OQ, and the claim is dismissed. Referee: C Hawes Date: 11 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. LC v DB [2023] NZDT 161 (2 June 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...not paying the remaining $2,000.00? If so, what is LC entitled to be paid? Did LC and DB have an enforceable contract under which DB agreed to pay LC $3,000.00 towards the costs of repairs of the [vehicle]? 4. Parties to a contract must perform their respective obligations. If they do not, they will be in breach and need to account for any loss to the other party to the contract. For an agreement to be a legally binding contract certain elements are required. These include: �€...

9. IQ & OU v EQ [2022] NZDT 278 (19 December 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...damages from the supplier (s 32(c)). When the consumer cancels a contract, the Tribunal may award a refund of part, or all of the money paid for the services of the supplier (s 38). The Tribunal shall have regard to the value of any work or services performed by the supplier (s 39). 11. At the first hearing, EQ stated that he had incurred costs of $1,393.00 for the job, including materials purchased, hire fees for digger/driver and labour hours. However, he did not have any evidence to...

10. OT US v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 169 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...been able to prove that it is more likely than not that N Ltd breached the guarantees outlined above. 26. For these reasons the claim by US and OT is dismissed. Referee: K Johnson Date: 08 June 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...