Search Results

1. Karena v Whitfield - Omahu 4C Section 6 [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 170 (2018 APPEAL 170) [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...on 7 April 2017 in the Māori Land Court registry in Hastings. This is within the 2 month time period set out in s 58(3) of the Act. The appeal was rejected by the Deputy Registrar on the basis that it should have been filed in the prescribed form at the Māori Appellate Court registry in Wellington. Unfortunately, Mr Karena did not become aware of the Deputy Registrar’s decision until 19 May 2017, and only as a result of contacting the Court to request an

2. OIA-97445.pdf [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 22 August 2022 Our ref: OIA 97745 Dear Official Information Act request: Moana House applications, Proceeds of Crime Fund Thank you for your email of 20 July 2022 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information relating to the Moana House applications. Specifically you requested: I would...

3. Director of Proceedings v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [2022] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [2.1] A Consent Memorandum dated 15 November 2021. [2.2] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’. [3] In the Consent Memorandum, the parties requested that the Tribunal exercise its jurisdiction in respect of the following matters: 3. (a) A declaration pursuant to s 54(1)(a) of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 (“the Act”) that the defendant has breached the He...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 052 Lakeside Developments 2017 Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...Act), the Environment Court, by consent, orders that: (1) the appeal is allowed subject to the agreed amendments to PREC31 in Part 3: Area-specific matters of the Proposed Waikato District Plan (PDP) as set out in Appendix B, attached to and forming part of this order; and; (2) the appeal is otherwise dismissed. B: Under section 285 of the Act, there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] This consent order relates to an appeal by Lakeside Developments 2017

5. Lee v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2023] NZACC 176 [pdf, 352 KB]

   ...Compensation Act 2001. [3] The respondent’s position is that there is insufficient evidence of a causal link between the appellant’s Parkinson’s Disease and a workplace exposure. Background [4] On 30 June 2021, an ACC injury claim form was filed for poisoning due to a chemical substance. The description of injury was: Worked for the Post Office from 1979 to 1986, was regularly exposed to trichloroethane and is concerned that his Parkinson’s Disease was caused by...

6. 2024 NZPSPLA 111.pdf [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...least two reminders and the fee was not paid until 17 July 2024. [22] Failure to file a complete annual return without reasonable excuse is an offence under s 43(7) of the Act and subsection (6) states that if a licensee fails to file the required forms and pay the fee its licence should be automatically suspended. Mr Taimalie advises all SPS Security workers are on contract, and he thought he only had to file a list of employees. However, he now accepts the annual return forms he co...

7. Restorative justice: Practice standards for family violence cases 2019 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...It includes: • A common understanding of family violence – a section to ensure providers and facilitators across the sector have a consistent and common understanding of family violence, risk factors, what defines ‘family’, the different forms of abuse that can take place, the effects of family violence on adult and child victims, and on parenting. 7 • Risk assessment and management – information for family violence-endorsed facilitators to carry out a comprehe...

8. [2007] NZEmpC AC 33/07 Schneller v Ranworth Healthcare Ltd [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...there were significant contradictions between the evidence given to the hearings by Karen Schneller, and her written statement made to Ranworth after its receipt of Alison Schneller’s personal grievance. The Authority concluded that it was the former (sworn evidence) that was unreliable and that the latter (a statement made for the purposes of later litigation) was accurate. [5] Although I accept, as did the Authority, that Karen Schneller was an unreliable witness, I have not...

9. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v TCLE-A-T6054929 [2013] NZCOP 4 [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...Tribunal, in relation to an infringement notice, it is presumed— (a) that each incidence of file sharing identified in the notice constituted an infringement of the rights owner's copyright in the work identified; and (b) that the information recorded in the infringement notice is correct; and (c) that the infringement notice was issued in accordance with this Act. (2) An account holder may submit evidence that, or give reasons why, any 1 or more of the presumptions...

10. Turner v The University of Otago (Legal Professional Privilege Claim) [2016] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 60 KB]

    ...personal information, the agency holding such information is permitted by s 29(1) of the Privacy Act 1993 to refuse to disclose such information if (inter alia) the disclosure would breach legal professional privilege: 29 Other reasons for refusal of requests 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Turner v The University of Otago (Legal professional privilege claim) [2016] NZHRRT 15.] 2 (1) An agency may refuse to disclo...