Search Results

1. NW v B Ltd [2022] NZDT 145 (12 September 2022) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...the above, the matter of damages in point 6(b) above does not need to be considered and the claim is dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: DTR Goddard Date: 12 September 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. Te-Au-Reka-and-Family-Court-Rules-Consultation-Paper-270923-v2.pdf [pdf, 940 KB]

   ...third-parties such as experts or specific service providers will be able to access information through the portal which would previously have been available to them in hard copy or by email. Completing court tasks such as filing documents and submitting forms will be easier than they are currently. Often, when filing in the Family Court, multiple forms need to be completed. In Te Au Reka, parties will only need to provide information once. More broadly, those engaging with Te Au Re...

3. BT v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 319 (19 June 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...his need to obtain a transit visa. The respondent’s position In a written submission, repeated at the hearing, the respondent declined to give compensation. The respondent submitted that when BT booked his ticket on the site, it had fully informed him on at least three occasions, that visa requirements were his responsibility. This also included requiring him to finally click a button that confirmed he had read and understood the contents of his itinerary, the fare rules (includ...

4. T v C Ltd v IQ & LQ [2023] NZDT 230 (18 September 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...hearing that this was a fair outcome and was no longer making any claim against IQ & LQ. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 2 November 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

5. Reid v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 35 [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...The Reviewer dismissed the review against the decision of the Corporation dated 30 June 2021 declining entitlement to lump sum compensation and an independence allowance. Ms Reid attempted to lodge an appeal in May 2022, but used the incorrect form. Ms Reid lodged her Notice of Appeal on 5 February 2023. 2 [2] On 14 February 2023, Judge Spiller issued an Initial Minute which directed that Ms Reid formally apply for leave to file the appeal out of time and set out the reas...

6. AQ & BQ v DD Ltd [2022] NZDT 4 (11 February 2022) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...a building of this type on that ground. This has resulted in extra costs and backfill now required. I have had regard to DD Ltd’s view that best practice requires soil tests and engineering advice to ensure good ground. However, I lacked the information required that soil tests require the amount dug out, and correspondence from the engineer appeared to be sought after the ground had been scraped back. Whilst there is room for opinion on this matter, CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2...

7. PV v OS & B Ltd [2023] NZDT 172 (3 May 2023) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...panel beater to get the car fixed. PV refused and filed a claim with J Ltd. 5. The initial claim amount was for $4,670.03. I noted that the repairers’ invoice was for $3,962.53. At the hearing J Ltd said they neglected to include the rental information. They therefore deducted the rental charge from its claim. The claim amount is therefore $3,962.53. 6. OS and B Ltd are disputing liability. WS is the director and shareholder of B Ltd. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 T...

8. LX v HO Limited [2019] NZDT 1428 (19 June 2019) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...hearing that GST inclusive figures would apply, regardless of whether an invoice would be presented. The award has therefore been calculated on that basis. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 19 June 2019 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to...

9. D Ltd & KN & PB v QD [2021] NZDT 1622 (28 July 2021) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...into his property. It did not provide security or privacy. He and his wife had wanted the hedge removed, and a paling fence erected in its place. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 [3] In about September 2020, PB had approached the Ds to inform them that she and her husband wished to remove an elm tree that was in the boundary area, and to remove the hedge and replace it with a paling fence. The Ds indicated that they did not agree with this proposal. [4] In November 2020, KN ha...

10. SJ & NY v XT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1644 (6 October 2021) [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...15. For these reasons SJ and NY are not liable to pay XT Ltd the amount of $289.80, being the sum overestimated for water use between February and October 2020. Referee: K Rendall Date: 6 October 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...