Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 106 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...25 November 2020. He applied for 20 days’ leave commencing on 10 December 2020. He did not provide a return to work date. It can be inferred that he wished the leave to cover the earliest available days. [11] Tranzit did not reply to this request until 23 December 2020, well after the date that Mr Morgan had proposed to commence his leave. That response, which the company has since resiled from, claimed that Mr Morgan would have no leave entitlement until 2024 as he had been...

2. XD Ltd v QC [2023] NZDT 607 (7 November 2023) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...QC’s suffering was as much a result of his own actions, as it was of XD Ltd’s actions. Therefore, no award of general damages will be made. Referee: C D Boys Date: 7 November 2023 Page 8 of 8 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

3. KM v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 324 (12 January 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...Background 5. After KM received the breach notice, TB wrote to Q Ltd using its ‘appeal’ process. Her appeal was declined. 6. In February and March 2022, TB and KM sent several emails to Q Ltd, disputing the fee and requesting further information. 7. On 5 March, Q Ltd sent KM a notice stating that, as the $95.00 had not been paid, a further $75.00 in collection costs had accrued. Similar notices were sent on 17 March and 28 March. 8. On 24 March, KM notified Q Ltd that he wi...

4. MT & Anor v NK & Ors [2024] NZDT 798 (12 November 2024) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders: The claim by MT and QT against all four Respondents is dismissed. Reasons Background and identification of parties 1. The Applicants (MT and QT) entered into a contract (“the agreement”) on the standard ADLS form to purchase the property at [address] from the First and Second Respondents (“NK and OK”) on 28 July 2023. The agreement was a secondary (back-up) contract with there being an existing contract on the property. The agreement was uncondit...

5. OIA-Compensation for wrongful conviction and detention - rates [pdf, 429 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T: 04 918 8800 | E: contactus@justice.govt.nz W: www.justice.govt.nz 6 November 2024 Dear OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT REQUEST: COMPENSATION FOR WRONGFUL CONVICTION AND DETENTION – RATES Thank you for your email of 15 October 2024 requesting information concerning the determination of the monetary compensation rates in the Compensation Guidelines for Wrongful Conviction and Detention (2023). Your...

6. [2025] NZEmpC 2 Young v Port of Tauranga Ltd [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...of the Port emailed Mr Young and two other potentially affected unvaccinated employees to inform them that the Port had received advice that the tug engineer role and the tug master role would be covered by the border order. The Chief Executive requested a meeting with the employees and their representatives. Mr Young responded that day and suggested meeting the following week. He also advised that he was arranging for a representative to attend the meeting with him. [15] In...

7. Wall v Karaitiana - Tauhara Middle 15 (2011) 38 Waiariki MB 218 (38 WAR 218) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...trustees expressed concern at the potential for confusion and delay should nominations be received from the floor. Counsel submitted that one of the advantages of having a nomination cut off date before the meeting was the ability to pre- print voting forms with the names of the candidates included on the form. In the absence of a nomination cut off date, either the ballot papers will have to be left blank and the beneficiaries voting will have to record by hand the names of the nomi...

8. Dudley - Matoa, Whara and Te Karaka Ahu Whenua Trust (2017) 150 Taitokerau MB 151 (150 TTK 151) [pdf, 275 KB]

   ...SGM. [13] A final hearing was held on 26 April 2017 (“the final hearing”). 8 Ms Dudley was unable to attend the final hearing due to ill health and sought an adjournment. At the commencement of the final hearing, I raised Ms Dudley’s request with those present and heard submissions both in support of, and in opposition to, the request for an adjournment. I declined the adjournment and proceeded with the hearing. [14] Audrey Martin subsequently advised that Ms Dudley had...

9. LCRO 75/2016 XN and WN v VO (25 February 2019) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...neighbouring properties (the main access). [4] For some years, until they built a house on their property, Mr and Mrs VO used temporary accommodation. In order to provide a suitable house site they had to raise 2 the level of the building platform on their chosen site, and obtain alternative vehicular access across the N property. [5] Mr XN indicated he wished to defer any agreement on Mr and Mrs VO’s request for an alternative access until a proposed change to the Council...

10. Guide to the Draft Exposure Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...draft Bill for referendum This guide to the exposure draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill (the Bill) explains the core aspects of the regulatory approach and how they work together if the Bill were introduced in its current form. The structure of this guide is the same as the Bill and is designed to be read alongside the Bill using the cross references included throughout the guide. After the election and the referendum, the incoming Government may introduce a Bi...