14979 items matching your search terms
...sum of $3,995.92 ($4,830.00 - $834.08 reparation). Referee: DTR Unasa Date: 19 January 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...
...head applies a slight pressure. The watch has to be placed face down, and, as the back of the watch is slightly curved, it has placed pressure on the 100 year old mineral glass and caused the crystal to shatter. NK, however, said his service was performed on the basis of ‘all care and no responsibility’. 7. I find that once N Ltd accepted the engraving on the antique watches, then it was bound to perform its service using reasonable care and skill and so that the result would be...
...other consideration provided, or both, as the case may require’. 17. Accordingly, I find LF and SF are entitled to a refund of $17,145.60 and an order is made. Referee: DTR Goddard Date: 10 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...paid refunded by SQ? d) Is QS entitled to be paid $150.00 for shoes and food left behind? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 What was QS’s and SQ’s agreement when QS moved into the property? 5. Parties to a contract must perform their respective obligations. If they do not, they will be in breach and need to account for any loss caused to the other party to the contract. A verbal agreement can be a legally enforceable contract. Sometimes terms will be implied in a...
...Lawyer F to answer. On this basis Complainant U was invited to attend a “case to answer” hearing to present any further argument or evidence in support of the application and to determine whether the matter should proceed further. Lawyer F was informed of the hearing but was not required to attend and chose not to do so. Background [5] This complaint is made against the background that Complainant U is of the view that he has a legitimate and longstanding grievance against Law...
...NU at $30 per hour is $2,520.00. 21. UT has paid NU $2,287.00 more than this and is entitled to be repaid this amount by NU. Referee: S Simmonds Date: 4 September 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...
...(including as to the interpretation of this order), any party may make request for the matter to be placed before the Tribunal in front of me for determination. Referee: P Ferguson Date: 20 November 2019 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to app...
...HF Ltd did not act with reasonable care and skill. HF Ltd is not responsible for any compensation claimed by HI and the claim is dismissed. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 15 March 2023 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...about the overall condition of the van, but rather a more specific comment. In any event, OJ said he qualified this statement but telling BZ that the van had not been used recently. In essence he was signalling that he did not have up to date information about the van. 16. OJ said he did not say that the van would “breeze through a WOF”. He accepted he might have said that she should not have any problems taking it for a WOF as far as he knew. He said that he would not have mad...
...outlined during the hearing, related to the deterioration in their relationship and the disagreement between them over the applicants’ complaints and their substance. This deterioration understandably escalated, particularly after the respondent informed the applicant that she or her representative, was prohibited from purchasing anything again from any of their branches. In the interest of a possible settlement, I explored with the respondent at the hearing, whether there could be a...