Search Results

1. DC v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 642 (13 November 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...CJ LTD tested the battery and provided data to T Ltd. T Ltd does not have (and has never had) physical possession of the battery. b. The data is inconclusive in terms of the reason for the failure. The results show no sign of reduction in performance over time, which is the common symptom of cell balance. This aligns with DC’s evidence that he did not experience any loss of performance before the sudden failure of the battery. c. A cell failure could have a range of causes incl...

2. DN & EN v R Ltd [2023] NZDT 725 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...$26,352.00 from R Ltd. [2] EN spoke for herself and her husband. She said that they had booked flights that were to leave [City] on 12 May 2023. Their intention was to attend a wedding in [Country 1]. When they arrived at [City] airport, they were informed by a R Ltd official at check-in that they lacked the required visas to enter [Country 1], and could not board the flight. EN and her husband explained to the official that they both had dual nationality, being citizens of [Country 2]...

3. VS v WN [2022] NZDT 221 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...required to pay to Mr S on the signing of the contract with WN ($2,741.94). These were all costs that VS incurred before the contract was cancelled. Referee: R Merrett Date: 30 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. OX v ND [2022] NZDT 62 (29 June 2022) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...allow, and which is a very common and well understood use of a bond in New Zealand. 14. The claim is therefore dismissed. Referee: M Wilson CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Date: 29 June 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

5. AODT Operational Policy - DELETE [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...work with the wider AODT Court team to promote continuous improvement and professional development for lawyers • notify Legal Aid of any non-attendance of rostered AODT defence lawyers • provide participant attendance reports and cost of service forms to the Legal Aid office, on the exit or graduation of the participant from the AODT Court programme, for the finalisation of the legal aid grant • develop and maintain strong internal and external relationships with key contacts �...

6. GE v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 442 (23 August 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...himself were also not reasonably foreseeable and are therefore not the type of loss that would be compensated under section 18(4). The claim is therefore dismissed. Referee Perfect Date: 23 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. NT v SQ [2023] NZDT 498 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...purchase, despite a lot of heavy rainfall in the interim. 13. I therefore conclude that the buyer is entitled to recover $3,366.66 in damages from the seller. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 31 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

8. NL & UN v ME [2022] NZDT 88 (8 June 2022) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...upon when bidding on the house. This report stated at page 15 that the concrete side wall of the carport was “structurally sound”. The following year a crack was identified in the wall and remedial work to stabilise the carport and the wall was performed. 2. NL and UN (the Applicants) claim $30,000.00 to repair the wall. 3. The issues to be determined are: a. Did ME exercise reasonable care and skill when he produced the pre-inspection report and was the report reasonably fi...

9. FQ v RH [2023] NZDT 552 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...excess realised upon sale of the item, as provided for in section 64 of the Act, must be repaid to the “Pledger” (as the person in RH’s position is called). Referee: M Wilson Date: 3 July 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

10. QI & UD v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 636 (28 November 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...plaster after the remedial work. UP agrees that this is a reasonable price for the sealant that would have been needed. Therefore, the claim is proved in full. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 28 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...