Search Results

1. SN v K Ltd [2022] NZDT 117 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...raised a dispute from the beginning and it needed to be resolved in the Disputes Tribunal, therefore it would not be appropriate to award interest. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 15 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. BD v ED [2020] NZDT 1383 (17 December 2020) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...using, and messages between the parties. 5. ED states the he had no issues prior to selling, the meter was calibrated in Australia and he never had readings that were more than a couple of % out. He also states his advertisement was based on this information and the meter was in excellent condition. ED also told the Tribunal there is variability between all meters. 6. There is no independent evidence to strongly support the allegation that the meter was reading well below what it sh...

3. TB & UB v HF [2023] NZDT 307 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...sums is in excess of the claim of $2,000.00. The respondent will be ordered to pay $2,000.00 to the applicants. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 8 June 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

4. OB v CM [2024] NZDT 121 (26 April 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...“ahs” in clause 8 has been changed to “has”. The date for payment has been changed to 16th May 2024. In all other respects the wording of the order remains the same. Referee: G R Meyer Date: 26th April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

5. SH v DM [2024] NZDT 211 (18 March 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...at the site. Except for the morning of 27 April 2023, there is no dispute that he was working at the premises. 12. SH did not pay the invoices because she believed that the invoices presented were amateurish and did not set out sufficient information about work carried out. 13. I agree that the invoices could provide more explanation of work carried out however I do not accept that there is so little information that the invoices should be ignored. The invoices set out the da...

6. BN Ltd v DL [2020] NZDT 1517 (11 December 2020) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...get it sent to your way.” DL replied, “So just to clarify for me, you mean I’ll end up with two trucks”, “Yeah”, “So, the same cost”, “Yeah”. 7. When interpreting a contract, the courts inquire what a reasonable and properly informed third party would consider the parties intended the words of their contract to mean, taking into account the “factual matrix” surrounding the contract. In this instance, the agreement about a CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 s...

7. FU Ltd v TB Ltd [2020] NZDT 1394 (4 March 2020) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...District Court [2020] NZDT 1394 APPLICANT FU Ltd RESPONDENT TB Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: TB Ltd is to pay the sum of $1559.24 directly to FU Ltd on or before 25 March 2020. Reasons 1. TB Ltd ('TB') performed a WOF inspection for FU Ltd, for a vehicle FU Ltd ('FU') had sold to a customer. The WOF inspection was performed 9 days prior to FU's customer arriving from Wellington to collect the vehicle and drive it home. 2. So...

8. UH v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 45 (2 February 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...why UH found that disappointing. Conclusion: 15. For all these reasons D Ltd is to pay UH $1,500.00 in accordance with the terms of this order. Referee: Malthus Date: 2 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

9. DT v BQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 22 (15 February 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...to all or any of the $400.00 claimed? 16. Where there has been a misrepresentation established, a party is entitled to seek damages. The object is to place the aggrieved party in the position that they would have occupied had the contract been performed as originally agreed. 17. DT seeks compensation, not a full refund. She paid $1,350.00 and $110.00 cleaning fee when she booked the property. She acknowledges she stayed on for the period she was booked in to stay. However, part of the...

10. [2021] NZEnvC 093 CEP Services Matauwhi Ltd v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

    ...character in water bodies and the coasta l environment (where not identified as outstanding natural character), appropriate methods of avoiding, remedying or mitigating adverse effects may include: a) ensuring the location, intens ity, scale and form of activities is appropriate having regard to natural elements and processes, and I 8 b) in areas of high natural character in the coastal environment marine area, minimising to the extent practicable indigenous vegetation clearance a...