Search Results

1. HE v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 500 (19 September 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...travel to [City 1] in May 2023. The purpose of the holiday was to surprise and treat his wife who had recently had some personal medical issues. HE was specific to the hotel and location where he wanted to stay. When they arrived at [City 1], he was informed by the transfer operator that the hotel he had booked, was closed for renovations and that they were staying at a different hotel approximately 4 kilometres from his chosen location. 2. HE claims $5,394.08 refund for the return airf...

2. BB v KU [2023] NZDT 408 (26 July 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...when the table had a TV on it; and a valuation of the table and 6 chairs dated 5 April 2023, which is after the tabletop was refinished. 8. BB has not re-submitted her prior valuation evidence that she had inexplicably redacted the relevant information from. 9. BB claims she obtained 2 remedial quotes but has not submitted either. It is unclear as to when the quotes were obtained as the table was delivered Sunday the 26 February and collected by the furniture maker for refinishing...

3. DM Ltd v GD Ltd [2022] NZDT 188 (30 September) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...conclude that the landlord is not contractually responsible for the damage caused by the fire, and the claim against the landlord must be dismissed. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 30 September 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. UN Ltd v MI [2023] NZDT 205 (13 April 2023) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...TOTAL $23,800.99 14. MI has already paid a total of $20,670.43 so the balance she must pay UN is the difference between that and the above total, being $3130.56. Referee Perfect Date: 13 April 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

5. KX and NX v GV Ltd [2022] NZDT 47 (14 January 2022) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...in s 43. None of those situations apply here. The claim for payment of the filing fee is therefore dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: R Merrett Date: 14 January 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. SO Ltd v NI & KI [2023] NZDT 189 (15 May 2023) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...of that year he applied to [the bank] to freeze the account as he was concerned that LM was using the funds for his personal expenses. 11. LM read out an email he said he had received from IK on 20 April 2021 where he wrote that he was not informed that KI and NI were paid $5,000 and the money was therefore stolen by them from the account. 12. There is a great deal in dispute between the former directors and shareholders of SO Ltd and some of that history was canvassed during t...

7. MJ v OM Ltd [2023] NZDT 52 (21 February 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...foreseeable consequential losses. She provided quotations in support of these costs. I therefore find that the total sum payable by OM Ltd is $6,162.46. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 21 February 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

8. T Ltd v R Ltd [2023] NZDT 100 (24 March 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...the validity of bank account details directly with the other business before paying accounts. This is particularly so when dealing with a new supplier. T Ltd also highlighted the fact that the email which sent the invoice to R Ltd was a [email platform] account and that should have alerted R Ltd to a possible problem. T Ltd said it appeared that NQ from R Ltd paid the account himself rather than using his bookkeeper. 17. NQ of R Ltd said he always pays accounts himself and he does not...

9. Appendix-A1-NZEAN-Legislation-Changes-Requests-2.pdf [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...for the very first time in the proposed Accessible Streets 2020 legislative changes. Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004 (SR 2004/427) (as at 01 May 2011) Interpretations - road margin includes any uncultivated margin of a road adjacent to but not forming part of either the roadway or the footpath (if any) Road users with animals 11.14 Use of road (1) A rider of an animal on a road must, when a reasonably adequate road margin is available, keep the animal on the road margin as far as practi...

10. The Estate of UB v KM [2020] NZDT 1322 (3 December 2020) [pdf, 191 KB]

    ...(being $7,449.11 to remedy the painting work; $524.64 being the GST that should not have been paid; and $935.00 for the stairwell carpet). Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 3 December 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...