Search Results

1. N Ltd v MX [2023] NZDT 387 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...conclusion, I find no evidence N Ltd have breached their obligations under the Agency Agreement. MX is therefore liable under clause 5.2 to pay the commission due. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 5 July 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. LI v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 479 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...pre-accident value of the Applicant’s vehicle was approximately $5,000.00 and the salvage value of the wreck was $300.00, making the Applicant’s loss $4,700.00. Referee: L Mueller Date: 3 July 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. INZ (Carley) v De'Ath [2018] NZIACDT 45 (13 November 2018) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...However, Immigration New Zealand’s letter had acted as a catalyst for a wide review of their work. [12] In his letter, Mr De’Ath rebutted the assertion of unlicensed advice being dispensed. No one other than himself had filed immigration forms or dispensed advice. While Immigration New Zealand’s investigation suggested Mr X completed the forms, their internal system proved otherwise. Mr De’Ath explained the internal process at some length, starting with the client provi...

4. NH & ND v U Ltd [2021] NZDT 1681 (7 December 2021) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...done, this involves starting the process over to replace their roof again. 18. I find on the evidence, that NH and ND are entitled to a full refund of $17,160. Referee: D Alofivae Date: 7 December 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

5. KM v BE [2022] NZDT 25 (29 April 2022) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...any party unless a claim falls within the narrow exceptions specified. This claim does not fall within the stated exceptions. 22. KM’s claim is dismissed. Referee: Kaho Date: 29 April 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. EO v BD Ltd [2021] NZDT 1599 (30 July 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...expected based on the sample provided, I find that her claimed amount of a 50% reduction in value of $750.00 is a reasonable compensation for the failure. Referee: J Perfect Date: 30 July 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. MS & NS v JT [2024] NZDT 238 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...element of “consideration” cannot be returned to them. Therefore, Mr T will have to pay them (in addition to the $6,000.00) the cash equivalent of $1,500.00. Referee: J P Smith Date: 26 March 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

8. KB v MY [2019] NZDT 1390 (29 May 2019) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...MY is to pay the sum of $11,891.60 (including $700.00 insured loss) directly to J Limited on or before 19 June 2019. (I note that the contents of Mr Y’s counter-claim were heard at today’s hearing even though it does not appear to have been formally lodged – I am not requiring it to be formally lodged because of the liability finding made in this decision) Reasons 1. Ms B and Mr Y were the drivers involved in a collision on N Rd in May 2018. They had both been travelling nort...

9. BD v J Ltd ES [2021] NZDT 1648 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...calculated in the hearing. Conclusion 12. For these reasons BD is to pay J Limited the sum of $3,753.42 by the date stated in the order. BD’s claim is dismissed. Referee: K Rendall Date: 24 June 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

10. DD v QX [2022] NZDT 239 (2 December 2022) [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...parties’ loss valuation evidence is $1,382.50. The Respondent’s 60% fault contribution puts her portion of the Applicant’ loss at $829.50. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 2 December 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...