Search Results

Search results for forms.

14815 items matching your search terms

  1. BT v US [2023] NZDT 112 (11 May 2023) [pdf, 111 KB]

    ...set out in section 10 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 and does not provide for such a claim to be heard by it. Referee: L Thompson CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Date: 11 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  2. SD v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 240 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

    ...finance for the car, the consumer is entitled to recover his total finance costs of $1,586.84, bringing the total sum payable by the supplier to $18,156.84. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 8 March 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

  3. CK & QK v XL [2024] NZDT 265 (25 January 2024) [pdf, 177 KB]

    ...the loose chip. 6. In conclusion, XL did not breach its duty of care, therefore it is not necessary to consider the other issues. The claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 25 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

  4. ND & UT v HX [2023] NZDT 329 (2 August 2023) [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...justification to HX for an act that would otherwise have been unlawful. I find that HX is not liable to pay UT $3,000.00 for the loss of A. Referee: Verdun Tawhara Date: 2nd day of August 2023. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

  5. UM v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 599 (22 November 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...warranty by having the fire’s repair undertaken by a person not authorised or approved by them. 12. The definition in section 2 Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (“CGA”) includes undertakings, assertions or representations relating to the quality, performance or characteristics of the goods or the provision of services that are or may at any time be required in respect of the goods or the supply of parts that are or may at any time be required for the goods. 13. MI acknowledged tha...

  6. MS v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 94 (19 January 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...vehicle arrived in on or about 6 November 2021, but was not given a VIN number and so could not be put forward for LVV and repairer certifications. This contract is subject to the law of Japan as this is the country where the party which had to perform the main obligations of the contract is normally resident. 2. On or around 3 May 2022, MS, who is based in Japan, agreed to purchase that same vehicle from O Ltd and it was exported from New Zealand back to Japan (the second agreement)....

  7. D Ltd v JD & WD [2022] NZDT 174 (3 November 2022) [pdf, 154 KB]

    ...That means the adjusted price payable is $3242.40. As Mr and Mrs D have already paid $1965.00, there is a balance of $1277.40 to be paid by the Ds to D Ltd. Referee Perfect Date: 3 November 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  8. DR v BU Ltd [2022] NZDT 199 (22 November 2022) [pdf, 135 KB]

    ...respondent or as a result of a call to the respondent by the owner of the carpark or the person who holds a permit to park there. 8. The applicants raised several arguments that there were inconsistencies about the way the tow was conducted and the information they were given after the tow. While this may have been the case, this did not negate the respondent’s right to tow the applicants’ car from private land. 9. The applicants also told the Tribunal that the respondent had a g...

  9. BORA Summary Offences (Graffiti) Amendment Bill [pdf, 394 KB]

    ...rationally connected and proportionate to that objective.[2] 5. On this approach, it is clear that the Bill, including the age restriction, is directed at the important objective of abating the economic and other costs that arise from tagging and other forms of graffiti. Further, as a significant proportion of tagging and other graffiti is carried out by people under 18 using paint spraycans, the age restriction is also clearly rationally connected to that objective. I also note the advic...

  10. NT v HO [2023] NZDT 303 (9 August 2023) [pdf, 109 KB]

    ...of any further deductions he considered were justified from NT’s bond, and has not done so. 17. On this basis I find that HO is liable to pay NT $455.71. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 9 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...