Search Results

1. FB Ltd v NG & BJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1486 (6 April 2021) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...FO is reasonable in the circumstances given its explanations for that approach. In that regard I find for FO and therefore award its damages claim in full. Referee: S. P. Kane. Date: 6 April 2021. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. CL v TU [2024] NZDT 82 (1 February 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...unfortunate instance where a company goes into liquidation leaving customers and other debtors without a remedy. 21. For these reasons the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 1 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

3. XB v KI [2022] NZDT 226 (5 December 2022) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...the service records available to XB. 25. Had XB taken the time to look over the service documents, he would have been aware that the DPF light had been on the day before, a static regeneration done, and the fault code cleared. All of that information was made available to XB at the time of test drive and sale. 26. The evidence does not satisfy me that the car had mechanical issues at the time of sale. A DPF light was on the day before, work was done by a Mazda dealer, and the fa...

4. II & SC v FX [2022] NZDT 229 (19 July 2022) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...the Applicants decided not to proceed, the terms of the simple contract that they had with FX should have been implemented, that they were to be refunded the $8,000.00 as agreed. It was clear from the evidence that the Applicants kept FX as well informed as they could. FX simply “jumped the gun” in purchasing materials, without any contractual entitlement to do so. 8. FX alleges that the contract was cancelled for inappropriate reasons in that he had had a falling out with the Appl...

5. DD v KI [2023] NZDT 42 (14 February 2023).pdf [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...$7,725.00. He is not entitled to recover his Disputes Tribunal filing fee, as that is not a cost that is ordinarily permitted by the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. Referee: C Hawes Date: 14 February 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. DD v SQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 72 (31 January 2022) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...have included SQ’s goodwill offer to DD. SQ left this offer open at the hearing. 16. These are the merits and justice of the case. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Monday, 31 January 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. AA v BB [2024] NZDT 80 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...claim and BB did not attend to present his counterclaim, it is not necessary to determine the third issue. 15. The claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Referee: G.M. Taylor Date: 26 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

8. HF Ltd v Q Ltd [2024 NZDT 229 (12 March 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...find it is not appropriate to make such an order, particularly given the costs incurred by the Respondent to seek payment for the initial panels supplied. Referee: A Chand Date: 12th March 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

9. D Ltd v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 731 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...terminating yet continued using their services, that a fair and just outcome is that M Ltd pay for 50% of the amount claimed by D Ltd. M Ltd is to pay D Ltd $1,776.06. Referee: Kaho Date: 13 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

10. OE v UC [2023] NZDT 47 (8 February 2023) [pdf, 129 KB]

    ...reasons and the full details of why she believes that OE owes her money for the series of motorbike dealings. As mentioned in that order, if UC failed to do that the hearing would proceed without the Tribunal being able to consider this defence. No information was received from UC and so the Tribunal has been unable to consider this defence. 6. The issue to be resolved is whether OE paid UC $750.00 in July 2021. Did OE pay UC $750.00 in July 2021? 7. OE provided evidence to the T...